[ G. R. No. 39719. June 02, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39719. June 02, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39719
[ G. R. No. 39719. June 02, 1934 ]
VICENTE FORMOSO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE VS. W. S. STACY, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________17th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of _________Cagayan__________, dated the__________21st______________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs of this instance against the defendant-appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the plaintiff-appellee__________ recover from __________the defendant-appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G. R. No. 45537. July 30, 1937 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-5199. October 29, 1953 ]
- [ G.R. No. 109036. July 05, 1995 ](315 Phil. 657)
- [ G.R. Nos. 201044 & 222691. May 05, 2021 ](902 Phil. 54)
- [ G.R. No. 9494. January 07, 1915 ](G.R. No. 9494)
- [ G.R. No. 175795. June 22, 2015 ](761 Phil. 64)
- [ Adm. Case No. 629. November 29, 1973 ](153 Phil. 390)
- [ G.R. No. L-17884. November 29, 1965 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.