CTA Case No. 352 (Decision)
-- ��� � ' .. -.. --- - � '-. � � � 1�
. .. � - � � �
... � ) t � � � � .. 17
i..'};,(.., t...I', "" -- \. .- T i . � ~ ,, i!3:L., $ f lu~ t pay t. t'Ul t ,, � (EJt l{blt y l ""' - ~- P� ., tt .r- Ion ( �� ot� - !. n f �v It .. ,. ton. Q r.: " 1 �"' ts p~t~t on !or rcve� ; � o h .ch pet t fGr .l'e p .. d .r � t't! t ~ � 1,. . 1. � I r y 1 1958. n !ol i l . �h~t .r .c li.e .t t -, I n ot p~t:t.t. tt:ns.r t � n ~- tax an . !.� f �t (1 t.J t. ~;) ;~:( r1 !1.1 � y .�� :tr t ~f� 'l 1.8 .I I ' l~
I. tn � f t � 19
� � - � - I l . � ' � � 20
� � � ... t � � 1 1 0 � � - �t
� - � � ct ! rn c � y ..... � � - c � - � �- � �� � � � 'I - .. .. � -� � - � t� on � � � ,, 22
. .. 1 � - � � ' ) � � 1 it 23 I
� or � f 1. � � t for :' 2 4
... l1 .- fn � }. � � I � �� l I -' .. �1 I. 1 � � rt :� 25
- J. .. � - � t � y .. � v - � '� � ,'' 2 6
More in CTA Decisions
- AICHI FORGING COMPANY OF ASIA INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6540)
- FISH2GO CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and REGIONAL DIRECTOR GERRY O. DUMAYAS OF THE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE REGION 9A, CABAMIRO(CTA Case No. 10286)
- CTA Case No. 20313 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 20313)
- MANDALUYONG CITY GOVERNMENT v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, (DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION) AND METRO RAIL TRANSIT CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2078)
- CTA Case No. 849 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 849)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. LAPANDAY HOLDINGS CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1888)
- SM INVESTMENTS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8798)
- UPSI MANAGEMENT INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7602)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.