CTA Case No. 535 (Decision)
-- � ��� --
� � 2- n ( X � 1 PP� 89 I Vi 1e �� 11 c.). � � � 77, 1 h r � � 1 ,.,� �c (s ,.. To cc ct . . 0 � fJ� 1~ . <.11 . ) Gt t� e .i. 1 n � 1... . �I t � t . . n� � l-1 � -1' � 1 l� c11 � ( h. '.!7, p � 1 7- c . }; l.-. ll c yt 1 c;. to Ci c ( � �� J � i t � 1 ~. 39 '
� - 1� �s + ce n t y X c c 0 .c ). p � .... � ol� � � � u� n� in ri 1 To n n rn 1 �( to .� I 1 ..} T. . . p. ~ 1 53 ( c r h t � ( 0� �� ry r 1 p � 1' n r n t.. �t � ai () 7?. y � cc n 1y p ct . 1 � ( �t � �� ec.) h p c n 0 1 u t. 0 o :.n �h� . . r h n ( � lC t ol. r. ) 40
- � 3 - � c1 c te c u upon di 0 n y 1 vi ( p � h. I 1 � � 1 ;) ' n it L 0 tiz 1 or c 1I p� Ie c i th n 1{ � J.7 � � J. �� c. ). �tp u 1 r. d� � - t s � � �� c 1 �1 . "' , 1 7, 1. � .. � l. � f y r c:. � y 7, 1 � i~ 41
.. ,. . � i ~1 -- c� til 1 0 of i1: t :l lOS t ' f r t.l col c on 0 + I { ' � "� . ti � 29- 31, c c . }. c 1� . 0 r 0t 11 � � .ri f � e n� i.ied c. . . pc t r� Z, ' 1c d 0 ; .. � d1 n, ti n fo. c .u y 1 � � l t1 c p - ct y, d c -�� t::r t0 0 c. ). t � 0 t c ( 1 �� � - -- --- -- -.. --- . l, 42
1� ri - 6- t t c �� I ... ... 0 c tt c t c�( 2. � �T �r p d t. ... � xon c u t u d \J � Ci r t � xl � i us t0 1 I � r c >. c ,a.e ( � � p� I c nn <l n o t c1 c d { p. � c rv f l� � ... n r I� ( � 2. pp� p � of 1 .. � 1 � .� t 0 ). ~ -� - - - - l: 43
I � 7- u 0 of h C o r nc � 0l �� t. d o� th � is pr. l la ' to c - 0 1t r. c. ). t: h cc ( nv t 0t :~ 4 1.1
- 0. o3 i~ 45
n � v- X l~ 46
� � 47
-'A � -. c .r lly i. c l dn . n � or 0 f or co li v t 0 c- :r ll 1 (., Y� T ceo C . ny. �r r m t ti t to ly cc unt for t l .... Ci r tt ov 1 t y's l c � t 1:01 \..0 .i f i u nc th t c r 0 Ci � it ut ~,
2- t �v7 0 ~ c io � r t1 1 l of c T~ � r ly c n:t i X... id nc � for � .1. of 1n t � 1 c t c t li h ci � 0 c�g r V. \C J. l o �� 74 � J . r v u� � . ! � l v y 1. 1~ ) l r� uc i ' i c i Y� i 11 1 y l� cf c v c l c tl t c - tr o�� � r .{ ) ic .) , c ... -- t ( ' �� � � � 1;1 d ;;
� of 1- ~c � of
� c c � it c � 11 � 61 � � I' 5 1 I
More in CTA Decisions
- JINNA MARIA O. YAP vs. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10019)
- DEUTSCHE KNOWLEDGE SERVICES, PTE. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1763)
- PHILIP MORRIS PHILIPPINES MANUFACTURING, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8791)
- CTA Case No. 4126 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4126)
- FORTUNE TABACCO CORPORATION, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with Case No. 6365 & 6383)(CTA Case No. 6612)
- CRESCENT PARK 14-678 PROPERTY HOLDINGS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1068)
- CTA Case No. 5312 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5312)
- TRINITY FRANCHISING AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9177)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.