[ G. R. No. 41828. May 29, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41828. May 29, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41828
[ G. R. No. 41828. May 29, 1934 ]
ENRIQUE MANALOTO, PETITIONER AND APPELLEE, VS. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF PASAY, RIZAL, RESPONDENT AND APPELLANT, GODOFREDO DEL ROSARIO, INTERVENOR AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________29th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the dispositive part of the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Rizal________, dated the __________20th__________ day of __________April____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-four____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of this instance against the appellants.
It is further ordered that xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________ recover from xx__________xx__________xx__________ the sum of Pxx__________xx , as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 139288. February 28, 2000 ](383 Phil. 500)
- [ G.R. No. 143133. June 05, 2002 ](432 Phil. 567)
- [ G.R. No. 12081. May 30, 1958 ](G.R. No. 12081)
- G.R. No. 237166, March 06, 2019
- [ G.R. No. 105892. January 28, 1998 ](349 Phil. 65)
- G.R. No. 181478, July 15, 2009
- [ R. G. No. 38907. September 28, 1933 ]
- G.R. No. 182499, October 02, 2009
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.