[ G. R. No. 39956. June 28, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39956. June 28, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39956
[ G. R. No. 39956. June 28, 1934 ]
BASILIA PEREZ ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. JULIANA CATARROJA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________12th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of _________Bataan__________, dated the__________18th______________ day of __________April_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees___________ recover from __________the appellant___________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 152244. September 27, 2004 ](482 Phil. 472)
- [ G.R. No. L-42255. January 31, 1977 ](166 Phil. 193; 73 OG 4303 (May, 1977))
- [ G.R. No. L-21762. April 29, 1966 ]
- [ G.R. No. 47895. July 13, 1942 ](G.R. No. 47895)
- [ A.M. No. P-2067. October 10, 1980 ](188 Phil. 323; 83 OG No. 10, 918 (March 9, 1987))
- G.R. No. 172971, June 16, 2010
- [ G. R. Nos. L-8848-58. May 23, 1957 ]
- A.M. No. 12535-Ret, April 22, 2008
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.