[ G. R. No. 39013. July 17, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39013. July 17, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39013
[ G. R. No. 39013. July 17, 1934 ]
MACELINA LEONARDO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. ANDRES DADO ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________30th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Albay________, dated the __________10th__________ day of _________June____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellants.
It is further ordered that __________the appelles_________ from the __________the appellants _________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 157802. October 13, 2010 ](647 Phil. 324)
- [ G.R. No. L-9037. July 31, 1956 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-33172. October 18, 1979 ](182 Phil. 61; 76 OG No. 30, 5222 (July 28, 1980))
- [ A.C. No. 12627. February 18, 2020 ](871 Phil. 33)
- [ G.R. No. 214399. June 28, 2016 ](788 Phil. 464)
- G.R. No. 226615, January 13, 2021
- [ A.C. No. 10793. September 16, 2020 ](885 Phil. 9)
- G.R. NO. 167109, February 06, 2007
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.