CTA Case No. 1484 (Decision)
~EPUBLIC OF TH-E PHILIPPINhl CO URT 6F T AX .&PPE.&U QUE2G CJIPY .r(jif'~r~... . 1 � - - - - - ~~�- X c r � 0 n r 1 r .' 1; � ' �� .' � � � 1 1 i' 27 8
-- 279
3 ~ th compe attn t x. eo lu 1on : l" 1 OJ"C"..(} by t t ' i� l' g 1 nt pl t n, th f" with ar,o s th t 1 tt rott lo d1 g .nd tml{ adi of s v ~ � �l t, po.r t cons 1tut{t' Ill m:i n.gl e res:"-! l . � e p md tit!on r' .nt ,nti �~ insisted t a�t o e '� re ro cro o towin car s l �. �:b t ceord.i.ng 0 d ' 1g U& d o . rJi . nd rt n '1th ~ ood lf.ltr:onP r"t nlllli Qt !,,. g �� nt t bt p $ engo.r no:r car o � s ��+"�1 i thin t wo 'Ect1o..'1 190 ot ta. T x Cc a , a ru...e-n � - ubl Aot ro.. � 3 '16 , wn1c ovt � fo11o-Atu �� t 1 nt ;28 0
-- hi .. lf � p .s :og r and/or e r o v�c �1 y b d: cl -- � lQ p fro t h co p n at1 ta , i i 1nd1$p ne bl that t h .t' �uire � ts t tb . t ry 1 w b e l. . w1 th t na ly: ( 1 ) eo A s nd .st be used by th impor _ l" m lr ( j th ~ �1' .~ .d/or car - 1t d 1:a ooast is - or oc . n- o!ng nav1 ation �. 'th. he qui. l t of c rg V6 s 1 with n th :~ :.c.onin nd pnr 1 w o.f th 0 .rgo .s 1 s p.c fi d n ,\..", ct on 190 of h T X Cod�; l!'J nd ..d tn a s r to the qu st on <L:by th�e ooritending p r 1e= � . t �boa tu 1 to .l ~~~1 or , now., f">t'l ves&r- 1 . rn. t i,o�l Die t A �. ' 1 1 a s.. �J '\t(tSnel bu lt t'or �awil'\ , ~yno.oymou with tu bo � t. ( u ;e ' -.-1c ion ry. ) ;� 281
�1 5 or r r r - ' tt r s i t 1 2 8 2 :~ '
c c DEC'l~ IO~ .... ST; � 1 dra c t ans art t - t .~.- or 3 r . 'il t l ' our Re u: 00 r ss r. ipt � l 0 di in 1 bt.t 1n s � .nd d/or ~1 u d� 11 i n t 011 J . . 1t1 ~ .n r r0 1 18. . .0 n b . X 1' 1" (') ~ . C? 1 :-iS 1v in nt 1n " in .,. ction 190 ot c ~ c I 0 ., 176 1 nt () h:tpp1n dU t 1 nif 0 do .... � ... 1 n .0 '11 1t ... th na 111 c bli e 1: I :~ 283 /
10 .. io. 1 . t 7 .. d tn bl.l 1- 0 llpp ~ r, e n t cl 10 bo 1 ntl o bl c � 3176. � iS 0 de?r 1 ~s c . e or t - rt t:h t tb. t law . 1uld be lib all co .... rt h 1 ' t. -1 tlr on� � 1n t 0 n ifL w hi ' th t t r �' re g1 E:' pond , t on. 'car ve u fit 1 - ti 1 , o:r :h :~ t1on 1 Int .ri � o ids . ion � a. , r - . n. ~7 .
... :� 28 5
c nt l ,e 1. ju$t1f:to tto , t ai6 ,..let _ v t e, ni . 1 . e t 10 . . . co s. ' i' 28 6
More in CTA Decisions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. COLT COMMERCIAL, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1884)
- LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT AUTHORITY v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE represented by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue(CTA Case No. 8893)
- SM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9396)
- CTA Case No. 5066 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5066)
- CTA Case No. 5078 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5078)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. DUNLEVY FOOD CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2294)
- CITY OF DAVAO and BELLA LINDA N. TANJILI in her official capacity as The Officer in Charge City Treasurers Office of Davao City v. ROXAS SHARES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1663)
- RCD REALTY MARKETING CORP., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8468)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.