[ G. R. No. 41788. May 22, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41788. May 22, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41788
[ G. R. No. 41788. May 22, 1934 ]
TEODORO MENDIOLA, PETITIONER-APPELLEE VS. THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF NAGA, CEBU, ETC. RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________22nd________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the dispositive part of the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Cebu________, dated the __________14th__________ day of __________April____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-four____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of this instance against the appellants.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__ ,as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 52498. July 19, 1982 ](200 Phil. 516; 82 OG No. 28, 3266 (July 14, 1986))
- [ G.R. No. 3500. September 07, 1906 ](G.R. No. 3500)
- [ G. R. No. 40569. August 28, 1934 ]
- [ A.M. No. RTJ-16-2452. March 09, 2016 ](783 Phil. 9)
- [ G.R. No. L-46562. March 31, 1978 ](172 Phil. 272; 74 OG 10713 (December, 1978))
- [ G.R. No. 51084. December 26, 1984 ](218 Phil. 676)
- G.R. No. 154112, September 23, 2004
- [ G.R. No. 68729. May 29, 1987 ](234 Phil. 443)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.