CTA Case No. 2750 (Decision)
0~) �(/ tIC OF THE PH1LlPPI:'iE8 .'I ' T \X APPEALS ON CIT / � no ... - ...... 27 ) . . - )( ... ... ... ... ... ... ... v �U ... T. � 27 � - - �I T ' .. fl --. --- ---- - . � � ...,. " X � - ... 123
� ... ... hy h h n �19 � u f � m 4 7 c cn J ui i. f d 1I � � e 124
- { o, 6l � ) � � � 76) 12 6
.. -- � f � y . .. 1 127
...., . eof f In di ul 'l v i.e n � nJul � .. n :r: 0 .. f th 128
7 1 t .metric i. � ~t l as j_ 2.9
~ -~ � ',J!/ � ~7 ~~ 27 . ... y, th e n ,:r � c 1 n 2 ,e () ;I ' ue Or w i t< l n� c1 un*'IY '1i (! li 1'1 td rt~ i h .r'c .n d d h 'V lue o� 2a. j ~ . e .. - x! cl� �n qu~ � J 1 .. ~iel 11 ni ( x.elu ~ ng xei��� m~ at f s) , ' ' (, ( t ..,.n .. ld z. � f~:tt' l i.n th f)~ y ccur ".l (; . u,n ' ..if?tl: )f t d .� n + tine in h-, fx X to ,U r"� � n 1) uh n " cr.,., 1 d .. o:r vi he v~lu ' c. .:rtc u. ~ ~r �t.i v.l c. .t c i ;1. �ci~l . 't ~ l ~ ... nvt�1C 130
� ih fl<l y c u c un v~lu 11 , n�../ r f\ 1 $ c nt. j t n cl n' ~ c. -lu �c I h � (:6 ( - r � u~n li - 131 1
� -. c- � � .1.. l.."l :t. h. ~�-t ....: .l . i �c ir. � C) t ic uly 132
- 11 � .. � �� � c in in ) - n l.C l l (� � c i c � y cn 1 n :c�c:: ch 13 3
-� � 1 of f � n � h i c � c n t'cl .l..
� -1 uc v -� l - c ch c ch l cy y .r n vu c n .� 135
� , � e i l' i l 136
275C 2751, 2.752 & 2753 x visi~ns ~ ~lie 1 � in th bs nee o viden.c� to thr contx ry. theze i no b :s1 the~ f re ~ th /ass xt .~ n cf r s on c-nt that he rect valu m~ ~ric on. The _ntm f .the st~ ut r vid~ the saf ~t g ide ~s to t whic. obedience is du - nd fr m ' . ich devla i n is not .;;,ll<.wable. J dilla v � �;ity f l-':"S y , H ..24� ':!9 � Jon 29 , 196.;.; , 2:~ jJil 1349. ) ' � rul d y ~his .cur i th c s~ f ~ sianer f ~u- ~.oms , H' " ;ase .fo . 2717, '"�ecf'mb :r � 29� 1 77 , nc x~itPr~t-d in �he ec nt e ~ o �1:11 :or. o.r ,ti.on {7hi li ��;ins) v:; � .-(lffimlssioner of _,u 0 is , c�r e J 1~ � 2599, -~bxu ry 2 , 197 , �Ie~i .. N~ti ~1 De er fl\ N � 34 , st:::tt"'S '.:tU i e clt~ .rly '- shoul~ be th m coo- sum~ ti n VRlu ~ . nd f . h m c __ .s1 m tion ~~lue "':h>r is i11..Jicat ~ � irt th~ �...c:nsuL ~ � '2tUn:~!Q.iAl , tr <~ .s.�.:,.-.i1j __ :;) invoices. Th 1 vJ h . d li t~r lly d fine . )$ . . . . . . . . ~~ the h m cc sum~tion v . lu~ s 137
�� in the 11<1 .,ll (;\' hex � c ~ts , "'hA o..~ tc ')l ... ng .. h . . . ; ....... ~ \. c~ n iti n x~~J1 f x hip;;l n t 'h). >h"li ~ ine;), nlun .::en l r) "'e:t c~n't o s.uc.. h ._,. ng ~: �,:�� 1<:-:. t-'f""�"-:"1'.� , ~:r nh cf �r.c : �o 1 -~ 1.� ."........., "\.<' "'""" -"'""".',"'"' ort�".'� <1.� ~~-J�l'""'');1.>������t �0 . - �� h . v lu ;. h�rt i"� I k � :> cf ~-h�' ccunt... y t:rcm ~t.ohe:r. <:-XP rt � .qi].::-t ~~ :-!""'� .;,_.;.;.:.;;..;,..;.;..o;.;:;.;,;.;.;.:;,...,~�l~ t riu :-~ �~:: 138
. � � 17 � j 'l'l%i. e ::r i. u � � "'i hi T er ny, cti n ' th n n, e ti c :;, p n P. < 1 s .s. .u n th r.nv v 1~ � ,Q> ch:\n�i \' �ill s �.r. v !."' pr ling �-�� ic � (-4. �� ,h( lt;d odg n c .nn f �i tbo ovi;;)i.on t e th h . r.\ c. nsU":'lp ion v~lu 0 "Ll'liCe n l l be n. v~ d cl X d in onsol A t e .�,m ei 1, d ly d s nt c d co u ;:; n oic v -r p.r c t.e h ment c on in .2~ 7' ,1 n c on . 35 e i": i � r.v�~t:r ~ t ' l7'�' � f e cl- ld +" f re n n e� .. ct� lC 3 � . ., r . (;tii. c c�n hich iflv ic �� sp ci n�t in i d 0t l.d b t r r un .bl .e 139
-� .. 1 - � y
� � -. � ... .' c ) ,~ 1 / , y � 141
... 1 ld e n� c ,. � � I X 1 jj c in n� n l: c 1n t.l �n �1 � v- � 1 ng � ., � <.. c ;o m n' r � ' 11 47 i' , � .. � 749 � ' rnb 1 � f 'J: nf f f by �4 t ./: ~ 142
"� ... .)1 - 1 r ~ � ul n ;c < - "ilv, l' ult c .r.r s� 9 � . -v nu .~.. t -.h oh.l l�.k ce ti y t the ion J: ~h 'h .l l - XC - t te> ' T fun~ r ::\. in.. x . Ji. vie -""' ... ,., ~or ;.1i .-: si cit.. r cf rn;..c n~l � !l wf4- y h ( rcvlsion~ o e~ch vs � . .-.ff vis ' f �" hou...c b -cti n � . i ng /. - s n ;;ho i � �) nd by ht: judgm"'n � to nd � if) judici~l uit fox he l int rn l 143
-2 - c .' � � 7� 7 "... � � ', � � � J 144
More in CTA Decisions
- THE CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF MANILA v. ZARCON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 309)
- SUMITOMO CORPORATION - PHILIPPINE BRANCH v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9422)
- CTA Case No. 5016 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5016)
- JINZAI EXPERTS INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9473)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. AYALA CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1152)
- METROPOLITAN NAGA WATER DISTRICT (MNWD) v. THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF CAMARINES SUR(CTA Case No. AC-91)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ESSEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.(CTA Case No. EB 3093)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. FILMINERA RESOURCES CORPORATION,(CTA Case No. EB 1649)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.