CTA Case No. 3444 (Decision)
K.EPUBLIC OP T HE PHil.lPPtNE$ COURT OF TAX APPEALS Q.U&zON CITY ~NSCOR CONTAINER CORPORATION , Petitioner , - versus - C.T.A. CASE NO. 3444 COMMIS SIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE , Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - X DE C I S I 0 N In i ts petition for review f iled with th i s Court on April 13 , 1982, petiti oner alleges: 1. That petitioner: Ansoor Container Corporati on i s a dome:stic c:orporation engaged in the manufacture of steel drums and pails with office/fact ory at 18 E. de l os Santos Avenue , Mandaluyong, Metro Manila , while r esponden t is the duly appointed Commissioner of Inter- na l Reven ue�, an a gency of the Government charge with t he duty of enforcing the national i n ternal revenue laws with offices at BIR Bldg . , Di liman, Quezon City , where he may be served with s ummons, writs and other legal pro- cesses; 2 . That on Apri l 14, 1 980, petitioner filed with r esponde:nt its final or annual income tax. return cover h 1g cal endar year ended December 31 , 1979 r eporting a net taxable income of P2 , 253 ,005.00 and a n i ncome tax due of P89 1,202 . 00 . Fr om the said i ncome tax. due and payable , pet i t i one r c~edited a nd/or deducted PL0,77 5. 00 and
DECISION - CTA CASE NO. 34:44: - 2- !1 669 , 314 .0 0 , re:presen ting; ov'erpa id 1 978 i ncome t ax plu s income t axes wi thheld and i ncome tax. payments f or the ,_ fi rst 3 quarte:rs of 1979, r espectively , or a total of !168 0, 089 . 00 , leaving a balance o f !1211,113.00 , which wa s paid on Ap r il 1 4:, 1 980 , hence , a t otal i nc ome tax. pa i d o f !189 1, 20 2 .00; 3 . That on April 1 3 , 198 2, petiti one r filed an ame nd e d i ncome t ax r eturn f o r 1 979 a fter i t disc o ve r ed that its purchases fo r 19 79 were under stated and r eported a corr ected net taxab l e income of only !11 , 761 , 007.0 0 and an i ncome tax due of ii694 , 403;oo . Since i t had previous- ly pa id !110 ,775. 00 and !1880 ; 42 7 .00, or a t ot a l of !1891 , 20 2. 0 0 , t here was an obv ious erroneous and/ or il- l e gal p aymen t o f !1196, 799 . 00 ; 4 . That o n Apri l 13, 1 982 , petiti one r f i led wi th respondent a claim f or r efund of t he afores aid overpa id i ncome tax of ii l96i , 7 99 .. 00 p ai d on April 1 4,, 19 80; a nd 5. Tha t petiti oner ha s insti tuted t h is appeal to pr e serve i ts r i ghts und er Sec:tion 29 2 of t he Revenue Code . Peti tioner therefore asks t hat respondent be ordered to r efund to p e titio ne r t he sum of ~196 , 799.00 r epre- senting alleged er r oneous and/6r illegal payment o f income tax. f o r 19 79 . Exc ept f or p artia l denials of certain a verments in par agraphs 2, 3 , 4 and 5 , allegedly for lac k of (\
� DECISION - CTA CASE NO. 3444: - 3- knowledge or information sufficient to f orm a belief as to the truth thereof , although they ar e� inva r iably within re~ sponde~nt's competency to c:hec:k or ve rify, respondent prac tically admitted i n his answer the aforestated allegations of petitioner. At any rate, when this case wa s heard by the Court, petitioner manifested that since i t s claim for refund was still being administratively processed by t he Bureau of I n- ternal Revenue and this appeal has been instituted to preserve petitione~'s ri gh ts under Section 292d the Revenue Code, i t might be propitious to wa i t for: the find i ngs and recommendation of responde~n t � s off i c:er s concerned . Then during the hearing on May 7, 1985, th e parties s ubm itted this case for decision on t he basis of t he Me:mor:andum for t he Commissioner dated October 2, 1 98 4 o f the: Chief of the Appellate Divisi on , which was con- cur:red in by t he Revenue Service Chief (Legal Office ) '� recommending, for reasons stated therein, that the amount of ~138 , IDI.OO be credited to petitioner Ansco r Con tainer Corporation . (pp. 31 4,- 315 , BIR records .) To put an end t o th is lit igation , petitioner manife�sted i ts willing- ness to accept the tax credit of ~138 , 10 1 . 00 i nstead of i ts or igin al claim of ~196 ,7 99.00 . To q uote the ab6ve- mentioned memorandum for the Commiss i oner: (pp . 31 4.- 315 , BIR records.)
DECISION - CTA CASE NO. 344:4 - 4. - MEMORANDUM FOR: The Commissioner .SUBJECT: This refers to the claim filed on April 13, 1982 by Atty. Demosthenes A. Gadioma, in behalf of his client, ANSCOR CONTAINER CORPORATION, for tax credit of ~196,799.00 as alleged erroneously paid income' tax for 1979 {p. 238) �. FACTS: Taxpayer is a domestic co v.: poration , organized and e xisting under Philippine Laws, and i s engaged in the manufacture of steel drums and pails. Recently, tax- payer disc:ove:r.ed that i ts purchases ac�coun t in 1979 with the National Steel Corporation (NSC) , the principa l sup~lier of its raw materfals in the manuf?cture of its steel drums and pails was understated thereby resulting in the said overpayment of in- c:ome tax for the said year. As claimed by taxpayer's ac:counting personnel, the error or r.econciling i terns were attributable to the breakdown of the company's accounting machines, turn-ower of pe'rsonnel an�d the change of ac:coun ting systeme Based on such rec:onciliation, the 1979 balance of th e liability acc:ouht due National Steel Corporation as of the end of the year , should be ~3 , 48 7,305 . 08 as against the unreconciled balance of only ~2,826,862.83 or a difference of ~660,442 .2 5 wh i ch normally represents the under-record- i ng of its purchases account. Out of such difference, the r�econc:ilia tion statement showed further that t he net amount of only ~353,463.53 constituted the net additional adjustments to the purchase account cover- ing the year 1979 {pls . see doc. on pp . 203- 20 4) e. Taxpayer's payments wer:e verified rem itted to the Bureau {p. 266) ~ ' .u
DECISION - CTA CASE NO. 3444 - 5- FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: The claim is meritorious. Investi- ~ation made by the examiner showed a refundable amount of only �1138,101.00 instead of �1196,799.00 as c:laimed com- puted as follows: Total adjustment for: 1979 � � �1353,463.53 Disallowed adjustment � � � 8, 211.18 Net ��� �1345,252.35 Refundable The or iginal i nvestigation o f the 1979 income and business tax liabilities of said corporation d isclos ed a defic:iency income tax of �1693,901.41, a deficiency withholding tax of �1115 ,677. 81 and deficien~y 3% con- tractor's tax of �186 ,122.91 . The afore- mentioned tax l iabilitie~ were, however , cancelled and settled upon payment and com- pliance by taxpayer of Revenue Memorandum Or der No. 38-83 dated November 14, 1983 (pls. see doc . on pp . 243-244) ~ In view of all the foregoing and as the claim was filed wi thin two (2) years from date of payment of the tax, it "is respect- fully recommended that the amount of �1138,101 . 00 be cr edited to Ansc:or Container Corporation, 18 EDSA , Man daluyong, Metro Manila, pursuant to Section 295 of the Tax Code . Respectfully submitted: (SGD .} EULOGIO H. NATIVIDAD Chief, Appellate Division I CONCUR : (SGD .) REYNOSO B . FLOREZA Rev-enue Service Chief (Legal Office) In view of respondent ' s recognition of the meri- tor iousness of petitioner's claim for refund in the (' )
DECISION - CTA CASE NO . 3444 - 6- amount o f ~138,101 . 0 0, instead of Pl96, 7 99 . 00 as claimed , and willing;ness that such amoun t of ~138,101.00 be credited to petitioner, pur suant to Secti on 295 of the National Internal Revenue Code, and peti- tioner's acceptance thereof , instead of ~196 ,7 99 . 00 as or i ginally claimed by i t, the parties maybe con- sidered to have ente�red i nto a compromise agre e ment to put an end to this appeal thru t_he rendition of a j udgment , as praye d for by them, incorporating such agreemen t or stipulation . (See Republic of the Phil i p pi nes vs . Marcelo B . G~ray, L-21416, Dec. 31 , 196>5, 15 SCRA 695. ) WHEREFORE , respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue is hereby ordered to grant a tax credit to petitioner Anscor Container Corporation in the amount of ~138 , 101.00 representing erroneously paid i ncome tax for 1979 . Wi thout pronouncement as to costs. SO ORDERED . Quezon City , Metro Manila, May 30, 1985 . cLln~~� ~~ / AMANTE ILLER ( . / Presidi g Judge WE CONCUR: (\ , I
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 2607 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2607)
- CTA Case No. O-94 (Decision)(CTA Case No. O-94)
- CTA Case No. 357 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 357)
- CTA Case No. 3022 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3022)
- DAKAY CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1294)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. THE MERRY COOKS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2681)
- CTA Case No. 639 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 639)
- CTA Case No. 2197 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2197)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.