CTA Case No. 1546 (Decision)
VALDERRAl'A LUI'~=)~ .\ l:A:.IU:FAC- Tu:t::I:ti COl'PA: ~Y, r:\TC. , Petitioner, - versus - C. T. A. CASE NO . 1546 COUFISSION3R OF INTEFL,' AL REVK DE, Respondent . x ----- ---- --- - x DECI S I 0 N Petitioner appealed fro~ the decision of respond - ent denying the former 1 s claim for refund �or tax cred - it in �the sum of P5 , 7ll o56 , representing 25% of the specific taxes paid on the gasoline, oils, diesel fuel and kerosene used in their logging operations from JuJy 1 to De c ember 31 , 1962 . Pe t itioner , a dooestic corporation organized in accordance with law, is a duly licensed forest conces- sionaire operating a logging concession at Ngan, Com- postela , Davao . During the period under review, petitioner and T. H. Valderrama and Sons , Inc . pur c hased from Caltex ( Phil o) Inc . fuel and lubricants on which specific taxes were paid o Pursuant to Section 5 of Republic Act No . 1435 in relation to Section 142 of the Revenue Code, petitioner and T. H. Valderrama and Sons, Inc . filed with respond - ent on April 24, 1963 a claim for refund or tax credit !' ? j_
in t t;.;t ... r .� ' . ti lt th ~ C urt� � � ,. i n !OJ;' n n t�b~ '~ i.a 1 1 ht?> rt u t' ,,.t'l h .. l., h (}. f,t w f'it, r t (;} .. .. ' a .. o G 1- th l r \:" 2
r �nd tt r n .� 1 n r C~l~.... t i t 31+- s c-i� in t.n ~ )fi;!IJ. . f t . l . i 14 1 1- ... , �~ of' atr .\f\1 n�r n ~c . ' rti �' 'I pc~ 1 t r orfl 1 l u.. t1 - t n t. t ,. ,...~ t) ~ hO ... ta t.f'.\ r ..r th~� ill - � nc � f 0 ii \! 3 ' '
To o� r t ., p9ti tio .. r h J. b&~r .-tbl~ llV t e �lear � tld� cottvi uc tng e d .. c t.. t l t: w. JJ e<= v .. !t li!h01lld l ,;l ' ;!I t !) :" !' ;s.:).,. ' 't;i J:t 4 ..
... ~.... I � i .0 \ I' !' I 5
- a0 .. b~ e . 1 t e. 1� ;'"~ . �t'rQ .t \ t-r�~ t .�eet . 1$ 0 a 1 fs '+.... :1 1~ 0 en� t.l t t 0' 1 ,.t,'! '{' cot 0 t~ J ., t',. 6~ il""' h . y-o jo, 4<. -t: t;;;~ . .~.~, � n 'L . ], M t ,l i'1 n~~.''"f" " .. .v. ~ t;,U..., 0~ -t � " rw. ... � ... l? �7 � ,.. ... J Iu � ' . :.J� ' , J..,,. .. 3, 1 n .. it t 8 'j) J. 6 .
' ... e '. l r .... 1 . h ' t1.' 7
fl 15' . a 11 1 �r t-9. 5 11 '.4 ~�10n i. S-11:� �til to n~. t 1 or r- ... c r.lt J'l!' t 1 . ,. ' � 7C:tt an .. a t- QO ic ' 7 , ~ 67~ . . r 1 n ~'!� nt ' rl ar 11 8 � '1/:. !".
' � t � . ' 9
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 5979 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5979)
- CTA Case No. 2530 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2530)
- CTA Case No. 1738 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1738)
- PROCTER & GAMBLE DISTRIBUTING (PHILIPPINES), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9634)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. COLT COMMERCIAL, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1889)
- CTA Case No. 1634 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1634)
- CITY TREASURER OF MAKATI, rep. by ACTING CITY TREASURER JESUSA E. CUNETA v. KURIMOTO (PHILIPPINES) CORPORATION(CTA Case No. AC-257)
- DEUTSCHE KNOWLEDGE SERVICES, PTE LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 834)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.