CTA Case No. 638 (Decision)
/� -- . �� j/ P!J , �� - �� � - -- - - .. ., -� - � - 1 0 � c 0 � p1 r � � p � 0 p � l yc y� � �y 235
... T � -'. c � , 1. + ... + on r ro .,. - n+- 0 .,. X S X l, r a +-i r + 7 , 1 � X X XC ... ... 7 �" t e ho ly � �or p +o p - a i -f: � � L i 1 yv r + 1 0 � � 1 57 r1 c tX on c n0 � � 1 '-1 f no �I � 1 :,) 0 r+ of i+ cl .7 � \C a 101 � "-t ~ co () 372, i � ~. � t f-i 0 .,. 0 fr n i a 0 0 fa b , l .. 2. cc y, c: u i.o 0 1.de 0 l 0 ;JU accr ' y ~ 1 r 2, i+ ou d � . c 0 cl 0 ( f ct � � � 236
� -. 1. � 1c � 0 0 / f 1 1 �� 11 a - eer 237
�6 - c ... %' 0 p ti� ... P. n of 1nto � + X on i+ 0� iV cto 1, 9 6 to h r lu+! n of i 5 ppl 0 c+ton 1 0 lie c+ c on of p 1 c Ac o. 1, h -, o+ d r � n r: + on 1 of . publ c .. c o. 3 i e +-h co.- c n of -h X Q on . htl c"-ion 1 of 1 expira ion. J.. +h 0 co. + .l a ,_ r + rX � 238
;, 239
� -- 10 +� c0 � + + () 0 1 y 1n 1� c enc c y y1�1 1 c Ac y1�1 1 t t on c � ry. 0 � 7. . -� c c n .. 240 I
' ., - 7 ... � 0 OV r h :r:y +n io nc n c c- 1"" 4- - f.� 0 0 p .c.!.+ 0 + f 0 or z 0 c 1 i 10 1 tc c 1: f r c ,. :ion of � + c ... 0 or n in'd � "o
�6 tnclu eo �1 an - � 10 C"'io 1 lc �5 X X 1 l r� ctl p n ary tn t.ry or p iod 0 f :r y c us+ y is or 12 � Tli pro $ yu cc o. l , n .;;) c+~ 0 11 X ro l � X XC p . p ""'o .c l, 1 n 0� 1 1 .,. n ... 0 i yr ul �n o r y Ut" i. xn - � r l ill l o. � hie 1 (; . li.! � � \O.f. prov n 1 c to X p+' +h 1 v +� + ... . il rc '" e ~~+ ... l X n � n ec ion l . .,. il"O $ i+ j. X .1. l +i y- � 0 all + X n 0 y or X ye � a 0 ... 1n � � e, .,:h *' ' ~ ... +. �ncl �n- 1 ax, o. + t f.i on cnip 1 ous+ry a or iz 242
.. ... r7 1 � hX >"" fro tC lx y X c I - , r o � 7 ion �o y xel t n l 1r 0 ... 1: L'1 '-r �- f 0 Co ... 'f: 11 c � h+ 1 � r 1 c c ...u Y� - 1 n - y � + 7. l e � y �1 r 7, 4- � 7 f y I 1 1 � + ' e J 1 l: ly :;: Y� 243
-- .; . � �8 � 10 - Ii v �+ c0 f 0 o. l ~er 1 v nu J. �h i.li in 1 � h oun+ 0 y f h co g ina , pcH�:i+ on r D. n1� r 1 62. dg did n 244
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 5547 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5547)
- CARMEN COPPER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8834)
- UNITED COCONUT PLANTERS BANK v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1017)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. HEALTH PLAN PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 3134)
- TRICOM SYSTEMS (PHILIPPINES), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9514)
- B.W. SHIPPING PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9115)
- CTA Case No. 1444 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1444)
- VALHALLA PROPERTIES LIMITED, INC., v. CITY OF DAVAO and HON. RODRIGO S. RIOLA, in his capacity as the City Treasusrer of Davao City(CTA Case No. EB 1706)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.