REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES v. MASTER COLOUR SYSTEM INC. FAUSTINO T. CHINGKOE, RENATO L. ALINDAYU, GRACE T. CHINGKOE, LINDA B. HAPATINGA & MARGARET A. DE LUNA
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY FIRST DIVISION REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, C.T.A. OC No. 010 Represented by the BUREAU OF CUSTOMS, Members: ACOSTA, Chairperson Plaintiff, BAUTISTA, and, CASANOVA, JJ. "' versus "' Promulgated: MASTER COLOUR SYSTEM, INC., FAUSTINO T. CHINGKOE, RENATO L. ALINDAYU, GRACE T. CHINGKOE, LINDA B. HAPATINGA and MARGARET A. DE LUNA, Defendants. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- x RESOLUTION On August 12, 2009, this Court issued a resolution ordering plaintiff Bureau of Customs , headed by its Commissioner of Customs, to show cause within fifteen (15) days from receipt thereof why the case against defendants namely, Master Colour System, Inc., Faustino T. Chingkoe, Renato L. Alindayu and Linda B. Hapatinga should not be dismissed for its continuous failure to comply with the Court's Order dated November 14, 2006 with regard to the publication of the Complaint with Prayer of a Writ of Preliminary Attachment. Notably, as of this date, petitioner continuously fails to submit such proofs of publication without any rationalization for its failure to do so. Thus, the Court has no option but to dismiss the case against defendants Master Colour System, Inc., Faustino T. Chingkoe, Renato L. Alindayu and Linda B. Hapatinga, pursuant to Section 3, Rule 17 of the Revised Rules of Court, as
RESOLUTION C.T.A. OC No. 10 amended; which allows courts to dismiss a complaint motu proprio if a plaintiff failed to comply with the court's order for no justifiable reason. WHEREFORE, the case against defendants Master Colour System, Inc., Faustino T. Chingkoe, Renata L. Alindayu and Linda B. Hapatinga is hereby DISMISSED pursuant to Section 3, Rule 17 of the Revised Rules of Court. SO ORDERED. t-..-:t.J=. 8.-....;L_ ERNESTO D. ACOSTA Presiding Justice CAES~OVA Associate Justice
More in CTA Resolutions
- LEPANTO CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10787)
- MAKATI CITY AND THE INCUMBENT CITY TREASURER OF MAKATI CITY v. METRO PACIFIC ASSETS HOLDINGS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1944)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, v. RODALYN EMPREDO RETANA (Barangay Palhi, Baybay City, Leyte) and MARIA JESSILYN PARAGOSO DONGON (Kentredder Square Annex Building, A.C. Cortes Avenue, Ibabao-Estancia, Mandaue City, Cebu) All-AT-LARGE(CTA Case No. O-1222)
- NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION v. PROVINCE OF DINAGAT ISLANDS AND ERMILINDA C. BIOL(CTA Case No. EB 1723)
- EMILIO AGUINALDO EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7703)
- CTA Case No. 2264 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2264)
- CEBU III ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. v. SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2318)
- CTA Case No. 3823 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3823)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.