[ G. R. No. 38868. July 10, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38868. July 10, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38868
[ G. R. No. 38868. July 10, 1934 ]
INCIQUE BADQUI, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. MIGUEL, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________23rd________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Benguet________, dated the __________31st__________ day of _________May____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed without costs.
It is further ordered that the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ from the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. NO. 139292, December 05, 2000
- [ G. R. No. 25694. December 31, 1926 ]
- [ G.R. No. 164640. June 13, 2008 ](577 Phil. 344)
- [ G.R. No. 186614. February 23, 2011 ](659 Phil. 362)
- [ G.R. No. 88243. December 22, 1989 ](259 Phil. 1105)
- [ G.R. No. 128003. July 26, 2000 ](391 Phil. 318)
- [ G.R. NO. 162716. September 27, 2006 ](534 Phil. 741)
- [ G.R. No. L-4411. February 08, 1952 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.