[ G. R. No. 39038. May 05, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39038. May 05, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39038
[ G. R. No. 39038. May 05, 1934 ]
ANGELA T. SEBASTIAN ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, TEODORO BAGUISI ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Nueva Ecija________, dated the __________26th__________ day of __________October____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts with costs against the appellants.
It is further ordered that ___________appellees___________ recover from ____________appellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 3037. March 27, 1907 ](G.R. No. 3037)
- [ G.R. No. L-27121. July 21, 1967 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-48738. May 18, 1987 ](233 Phil. 622)
- G.R. No. 134188, March 15, 1999
- G.R. No. 154705, June 26, 2003
- G.R. No. 241518, March 04, 2020
- [ G.R. No. 42890. September 20, 1935 ](G.R. No. 42890)
- [ G.R. No. L-45551. February 16, 1982 ](197 Phil. 713; 80 OG 3155 (May 28, 1984))
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.