CTA Case No. 205 (Decision)
l'l~PU H. � II 11'1 IN COUHf l- ,\Pl'EALS MAJ\IlLA .. v raua - ��� � 205 r -ent. I l ...... ,~ -�J( 6 ------ Tb1s is eal filed by petitioner fr th d cision of s asing a inst t form r e ount of 39 , 10. d 1 , 173. as ---�--�--e.n..t..tax o the 5 of th total b ta which was set aside f r prize� to t e ers of winning orses and authorized bonuses for jockeys and on th 1/ p rticipati of the oard on Races (now kn .n as the nts ard - ) rin the eriod fro ov er , 19 to cto er, 1947, ov b r 1 , 1947 to cto er 31, 19 � r eetive!y , inclusive of aurcharges. The facta in t is cas are sl le. P titioner nila J ckey Club, Inc., ia a co or tl ly or n ze un r t � laws of t e i l pines. It ia the successor to an old 1nco orated associa- tion known a the 11 ni l c ey Club , and is ng ged in t � sines of holdin horsl racea in anile. Bett ing in ora races is all e by law t rou h t � sale of ticket to t e public by t e racing club. The total ount of oney ch the 18 ,_t I c.
.... 2 - w� p bl1c b t n a ~aee i c ll total er f nda. ing t e p�riod d ~ � the �total ager n r celv d f~ t � le f ti~kets ~ dlstrib ted oll � t.r1 l/2 - e d dtstri t d g rs of winning ticketsJ 12 l / ... t a � did ot incl d In it r urn of t u art f 1 �g s th o 1 n th "total und&" et ide fo p z o wi ning orse (5, n fr l lund f t nt s d p titlon r efi i ncy u id xclud ort on . of ro thi ssess- nt, iti r fil p 1. Th i e A. v lv n arized ' 0 l th �g 0 I" c ipt � f (l) titi n r subj e � t he nt tax pr scrl din 2 of t ra � , inclu th 1/ t s1d ei 1 nd 8 nt o rd an e 6 � or ria: of ,. 1_ 85
- � 205 - 3- ne a of nning horae� and authorlz d nueea for joc~eya; d (2) ng t at th entire 12 1/ of th �total w 9 r fu ds� 1s sub eet to the �� &nt tax , (a) eth r or not p titi n r 1& 11 l fo the pay- nt o t e all� itiency u � n tax conai- derin th eqUitable d f s t1 tit fil d its r turns pu au nt to t i n o of ct f s ic ( in n � 34 � a. 19 l.): � n t de ic c;y t ta t of 39,5 3. b -. c ib d? � d t rorn t p ion � ef c ency �� nt in t ,1 � � already np d. �� pet t1onez d t ross zece pts� w. i ch a subje t 0 G t f rs on t a r c pts 1eh 1 c fr ly cl din th a nts � ts � out lly d X' l t ce t f nd nt ownera an jock y fth or � ot ' ent clai s t r c- t1 � 3 ' 1 of 1941, lie la is � ini � e tt1 a all d atr llow s (1 ) 7 l l t� (2} 12 1/ co.- on , r e-tr c � r in clu , any o :r 1 ng rse cin � n o:rt, 186 - ~------- --~---
"total a f nds � It could legoll disbu%8 for it own pu os s only th aid 7; end ot th total 12 11 of t tot 1 we er f � d -. th l:e rd t o as rcl eld in tru by pettt1 n r, nd 1 t � le l n r& - th G G nd d the ers end I ence, it ia � aisn r to t� on� of p titi er f r n~l de th amo ts f ~ p 1z of u o- ri d bonuc s f j nd t � l/2 p 1eip tion of � ard over ich p ti- ti r erein & i cr ti r:. a att r of' ight baa on c es p ovl ion f 1 ts nd j keys f winn � 0 nd th d se- nt& oard c ro p t t.ion r fo.. - ir r p c 1v r in t 12 1/2% of ~l tot l ger fun s~. e. , �x c , - ries 0 941; ct e 9, � � "" � ) C xt inly � t � � 1'06& :cec ipt s� w. c. ubj et to t U$ talC under Section 2 f t T X Code 0 l d ot 1 c .o ta 1 9 ll d/01' set 1d s nts dt � rs and jock y t nt .- l� o he is t ould :i � g t e t t X n 2: c ipts upon t l.C w n v c i vod. 1 88
-6- or over, t h t � rots r ec t � o usod in Section 2 t e T x te d i h .t 9 d t o receipts btain d fro h l ding t10 r aces has al� re dy been g von a consist t nd sound ed i nia ro- tive interpz t t1on � to oxcl o n s et s1de or allot t e amao d u � t o r d and ers end jockey of 'in n hor (Opi - nton � 34~, ries of 1941; in1o o. 249 , S ries f 1952; nd qp nion o. er es o 1955, all t i e c:t t a.ry c J uat1c ). Th . n- terpretatlen giv by t ec ~ct r of vstic o C $G t bar, e find no v l i d nd strong ea son to d xt � ( ov't of . I . v. ni c p lit~ of Binal n�n , 2 hil . 634; l olin v. rty. 37 P il. 545; Yra v. ' 5? hi � 3 �� i l � u 8%' Centrals g ncy v. Col l ct r of cu t om , 1 hil. 131. ) It ou d e not d th t that may still b entert i ne after t r nd t the three opinions o t ~ee ecre ar1 a o Justice, a to t e eening of th p '* btal.n in conducting hora reces, has d f i nitely clari- fi d nd aettlGd :1th t e en ct nt o epu lie Act Jo. 1933 by the 1 t Co r �� on June 22 , 1957. Con- gresl , in ~he di stribution of the �total wa r un s � or gross r ceipts fro t.e s 1 f tickets. ha clearly � erated fro t. co 1as1on of t p o , 189 lt3
- -- t � 2CO -7- racetr ck . cing c:;l , or any ot, tity ccn- ductin t, c� porti n oul $t d i s ... � era d n tn , tri ut on o r c pt ll be a o lo as 87-1/ , - d 6-V ic h p rson, ~-1/2. - 'r ng club , or ntity c n u ti l/ - 8!), - -1/? 6 for J.nnin nd 1/2 - ~ ci 1 fund of th nd sements 8 ar � aving rrived t t is c . eluei ad to t firet 1 , it bee s necessary for Court to pats on t e a ec n i u � t v en � �t of Intern 1 dee! 1 of r ~pond nt Co v ue . should be, s it is ed , itbo t 190 / () .
\ - 8- p%onoune nt ,, to coat s. anil � ril 15 , l95e. Associ t J udg ~~ 1 9 1 /I
More in CTA Decisions
- FSM CINEMAS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7074)
- ALCAN PACKAGING STARPACK CORPORATION (FORMERLY STARPACK PHILIPPINES CORPORATION) v. THE TREASURER OF CITY OF MANILA(CTA Case No. AC-17)
- CTA Case No. 5821 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5821)
- CORAL BAY NICKEL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8641)
- DENSO PHILIPPINES CORPORATION, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2239)
- PARITY PACKAGING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8825)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PRHC PROPERTY MANAGERS, INC.,(CTA Case No. EB 980)
- CTA Case No. 2511 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2511)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.