SC Decisions G.R. No. 1128G.R. No. 1128 1903-04-29
[ G.R. No. 1128. April 29, 1903 ]
[ G.R. No. 1128. April 29, 1903 ]
[ G.R. No. 1128. April 29, 1903 ]
CHIYE MAGATINGE, PETITIONER, VS. LA ELECTRICISTA, RESPONDENT.
D E C I S I O N
LADD, J.:
The defendant demurred to the complaint, and while the demurrer was still pending filed an answer. These two pleadings can not stand together. The effect of the filing of the answer was to supersede the demurrer. The motion to strike out the demurrer should be granted. So ordered.
Arellano, C. J,, Torres, Cooper, Willard, and Mapa, JJ., concur.
McDonough, J., did not sit in this case.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 127227, February 28, 2001
- A.C. No. 6664, July 16, 2013
- [ G.R. No. 187836. March 10, 2015 ](755 Phil. 323; 111 OG No. 25, 3454 (June 22, 2015))
- [ G.R. No. 193677. September 06, 2011 ](672 Phil. 419)
- G.R. No. 128363, May 27, 2004
- G.R. No. 141809, April 08, 2013
- [ G.R. No. 92706. May 21, 1992 ](284-A Phil. 630)
- [ G.R. No. L-20086. July 10, 1967 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.