CTA Case No. 4946 (Resolution)
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES OOURT OF 'fAX APPEALS QUEZON CI'l'Y DOW EI.ANCO B . V � � Philippi,ne Hranell, Petitioner ~ - versus -- C. '1' . A. CASE NO - 4946 'I'IlE COHMIBSIONRR 01! IN'riDlNAI. Promulgat .ed: : � ..- OCT 19 1994 �� ~ HEVENUEP Respondent. - - - - - - - - - ~~~ . X- - - - ::R.ESOLl.T'.� I ON Conflrm:tn~ the ordex� in open court o n October 14, 1994. petitioner ' s motion to withdraw its petition for r e view , t.o which respondent has offered no obj ec tion or oppoa.i tion, ie GRAN'fKD . Accordingly, let said petition be considered withdrawn and this case deemed c lo~ed and terminated. SO ORDERED . ~ . Q, �~ ERNRS"ro D . ACOSTA .. .. ~~".:~(.A. ,:'~ _"-:�-_w .� . ~~eeiding Judge. GRUBA N 0 . J)E Judge Assoc iate ,Jtrdg � �
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 1431 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1431)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. DOHLE SHIPMANAGEMENT PHILS. CORP(CTA Case No. EB 1665)
- CTA Case No. 3847 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3847)
- REITOH COLD STORAGE INC., WE LEAD GROUP HOLDINGS INC., ELENCE MARINE AND INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, MBPS CABLING CORPORATION, GARUDA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, BCP DERMATOLOGICAL CORPORATION, AUDIO VISEO SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, DUNAMIS IMPORT-EXPORT PHILS. INC., ALEN V DRAGON CORPORATION, MEDEV MEDICAL DEVICES CORPORATION, CHRYSALIS CONSTRUCTION AND TRADING CORPORATION, PAPISSS INC., ICON REEFER CORPORATION, JRT CONSTRUCTION AND TRADING CORPORATION, DATALINK SOLUTIONS TECHNOLOGY AND CONSULTANCY INC., ABBE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC., EXEQUIEL BALANDAY ADORA, KEN N RIE TRANSPORT INC., R2B2 REALTY & DE(CTA Case No. 10420)
- CTA Case No. 1934 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1934)
- PHILIPPINE CHARITY SWEEPSTAKES OFFICE (PCSO), represented by its General Manager, MELQUIADES A. ROBLES v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (CIR), BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE (BIR)(CTA Case No. 11435)
- DAEWOO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8829)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. HI-STAKES GAMING, INCORPORATED(CTA Case No. EB 2841)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.