[ G. R. No. 39259. June 08, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39259. June 08, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39259
[ G. R. No. 39259. June 08, 1934 ]
MAURA LUMANLAN, APPLICANTS AND APPELLEE, VS. DOMINGO YALONG, OPPOSITOR AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________23rd________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Tarlac__________, dated the__________9th______________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of this instance against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellant __________the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 61716. January 31, 1984 ](212 Phil. 392; 82 OG No. 38, 4562 (September 22, 1986))
- [ G. R. No. L-5783. May 29, 1953 ]
- [ G.R. No. 42782. October 31, 1935 ](G.R. No. 42782)
- A.M. No. P-01-1497 (Formerly AM-OCA-IPI-00-837-P), May 27, 2004
- [ G.R. No. L-47646. September 19, 1988 ](247-A Phil. 475; 86 OG No. 32, 5900 (August 6, 1990))
- G.R. No. 180447, August 23, 2017
- [ G.R. No. L-162. April 30, 1947 ]
- G.R. No. 141183, January 18, 2001
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.