CTA Case No. 1144 (Decision)
vuLJ ~ )f' rHE. I'I1.1.L<1�"'P!N IIIft ~ Ul T OF 1',1\.X APFEA.l..l IIAND..4 I CT � 11 X- - 415
l,l- C1 �1 2 r fi r it ct r� 1 1 t 1s � 8 r1 0 � 1 or t t t 5i 0 � i i th u t 0 1r - t t 1 t t (2) t 1 1 I n l .. e0 l - 1 � l . � c ClU 1" 1 lo. � 1 t l t1 �1 416
c o. CI IO"'l .... 11 .. ...,,~ ' 3 rul � or o 11 for i;wo rea ons . t p 1 1o 1 1 t - 1 s r .sot�v ticn ht t 1 b h t th: ta. h r~ i h 11 lieu of all o h r ' un1- e p 1 , provi n"-"ial or o ti- l t ~) .ti tic 1u ct t th tr t x ot 5 provide in ctio tt EJ 11 (l 3. 1 t fer o o1 or h . 1. 1 � 41 7
� 11ft4 nd t e ion app al d t o o r� th b ffir , b co t . int p t1tion r . 0 �' .D . ' n1 t c r 1 1 1 6) . . 41 8
More in CTA Decisions
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. REYNALDO M. PAZCOGUIN, JR. and RODELITO M. BIAG (Consolidated with Crim. O-231, Crim. O-232, Crim. O-233 & Crim. O-236)(CTA Case No. O-229)
- CTA Case No. 6274 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6274)
- CTA Case No. 53 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 53)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. G & W ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CO.(CTA Case No. EB 1449)
- CTA Case No. 3502 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3502)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PHILUSA CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2566)
- CTA Case No. 1271 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1271)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-51 (Decision)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-51)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.