CTA Case No. 2360 (Decision)
�q �Pl!i.!l'Pl',o ( (. � Al'l:'~AL,' .. L.n'Y I � -- t 0 .. ?, , �
� � 1 11 o.r n - ,, .... ' h ti "" h .. h h o� ,, 7 3
3 cs / ? t t' l n ;. i 74
n .cunu ... C Ti~ CJ.S'f' NO � 2, �6 $ y l 1 , o.~ ion N h p 1 y imr.;o... by J> r..tn coo . � I I 1s 0 or :r �tole 612 ( t �~ Corl:<t -�omr~wr or h oh {i � ls �~th r 6tt1~$ t .. ca . of' v s l s bu ot 0 5">1 r t.h~ tar� r nd CiJ 0~"" Co 0 .r rn 11. cas~ � /r n<: r th t� r 1 w tl f et h e ll n a f. ~.t v .:.. n ca:r s of s uti as num or 1n th Cede Cor�. t: to ai.nst t';.:~ p (}' ity. lh law il'lc.t.ud.,..., thE~ ~ 0 tl. c n r lO*~ o' tl e ..AS~ l.. ti 0 th -a a_,er t 't .1.pr1:1 1 '""ion _/ of l he f t 0 1:1 n') l i 1 �� t1 ni. t 1 .h cf t h u go 1s cont ol of t n .1~"~ t 1. ly null:Ifyin cet~on :>.'~2.3 or tb , �riff u��)d Cr too$ "'od , br h ng .t, e the nr v ton of �"cct on .. 5 } 11u-!nes, 1 b~ 100 s tJ ti io ~ r to abid hy � t:r �s c� ~ 1.... g nc to 1 ,llor. h~ . � "" noth!ng <.�hor t , f th,:,;.t on ~,.;u t � ,. 1
~r -o., 1 .e . � �f usto . , / r 1 .. 73 t> .h ' S Cot::. ..t B lc.;. 1 ir� ~���� � 111
,, .. 0 '!.# Vi c' o I� ?f '--, 1,., .A ~1 ' .. ,, !1'\ �~.t. 77 1. �\'\' 14'
More in CTA Decisions
- KUEHNE + NAGEL, INC. v. CITY OF PARA?AQUE and ANTHONY I. PULMANO, in his capacity as the City Treasurer of Para?aque(CTA Case No. AC-206)
- HUEY COMMERCIAL, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8985)
- AFP GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8191)
- CCT MULTI-PURPOSE COOPERATIVE (Formerly CCT Credit Cooperative) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10351)
- CTA Case No. 6235 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6235)
- CTA Case No. 944 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 944)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CONAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1732)
- CTA Case No. 3729 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3729)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.