CTA Case No. 3383 (Decision)
Gtl!PU&tUC OF ;HE l"tHl!Pf>.NJ"I) COURT OF TAX: APP�Al..S QUJ!ZOM C1 !'V COMMONWEALTH MANAGEMENT AND SERVICE CORPORATION, Petitioner, - versus - C.T.A. CASES NOS . 3383 and 3578 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - X DEC I SID The above -c aption e d c a ses are consolidated by reason of common issue involving the same peti- tioner on its claims for efund o{ a lleged over- payments of,. income taxes in the amounts of ~84,334.00 and ~100,51 3 .00 for the yeors 1980 and 1981, respectively. Thus appearing, petitioner, o do mestic corpo- ration, had for the taxable year 1980 the withheld income taxes from source by its withholding agents as evidenced by the various BIR Withholding Tax Certificates (Exhibits "B" to "B-7'') "L1g(]r e gating the sum of ~84,334.00. It incur r ed losses , however, in the net amount of ~8,871.00 os s hown in the \� 361
DECISION - CTA CASES NOS. 3383 & 3578 I" - 2- income tax return filed with the resporident on Apr il 15, 198 1. (Exhibit " A") . Petitioner sought �, the refu nd of the total amount withheld as excess inco me tax payment for the year involved, under letter-claim dated September 11, 1981. (Exhibit " C" ) . And , to hedge against th e running of the period of the statute of limitations filed this petition f or review on October 20, 1981 . (CTA Case No . 3383) . It does appear likewise that petitioner filed i ts income tax return for the year 1981 with the respondent's office on March 15 , 1982 showing a net loss of e2,237.DO. (Cxhjbits " 8 " and "13-1"). The taxe s withheld from its serv i ce fees income ' evidenced by BIR Withholding Tax Cert ifi cates (Exhibits "A" to "A.-4" , inclu sive) totalled El00,512.D O, now sought in the petitioner's claim for refund under letter dated June 28, 1982. (Exhibits "C" and "C-1" ) . It filed the instant pet iti on for re vie w on Jun e 28, 1982, entitled CTA Case No. 3578 . It does not appear that respondent Comm i ssioner ~f Intern al Revenue disputes the correctness of \ 36 2
., DECISION - CTA CASE S NOS. 3383 & 3578 .� � - 3- the material facts nor has pre s ented any evid e nce controverting the same. Respondent po s e s no �. objection in having the Pases submitted for de ci- sian on the basis of the pleading s and CTA records. All told the material facts are relatively simple and so are the issues under r es olve es s en- tially addressed to the qu e stion o f whe ther or not petitioner has e stabli s hed a valid claim to the refund of excess income ta x paymen t s fo r the taxable years in question. The cases before Us hardly pres e nt a uripping question or require a tortured ratiocination. As thus shown the basis for the claims are not short of specific support in terms of t r act able data openly laid and fully disclosed � . Going by the records, petitioner's income tax returns for the subject taxable years have shown lo ss es an d exce s s income tax payments. Re s po n cl e n t p o i n t s t o n o ,_ factual errors nor superfluities wh ic h need be abridged. Neither were there any deficien c y assessments issued. Moreover, the r ec ords make ~t clear that the requi s ite st a tem e nts or certi- fications of the income ta xes withheld and deduct ed \
DECI SION - CTA CASE S NOS. 3383 & 3 5 7 El ,. - 4- by th e withholding a g e nt s through whi c h re s po n d e nt collected the income tax es , an d u pon whi ch t ac ked the claim e d refund could furni s h th e bas i s f u r a definite resolve. But official a ct i o n thereon appears consigned to a limbo of linq e ri ng ve rifi- cation, to dateL We s e e no re a son and none i s v ou c h s af ed wh y thes e sim p le c as e s wh e r e f act a n d Fa br ica t ion are no longer indisti.n ~Jui s h a b Jc , Ghould r enw in c u r iou s l y unperturbed , It may be neces s ary to r ep eat wha t this Court said in what s o pl a inly app l y to th e cases at bar that, 11 But. as sho uld b e expe c te d, th e action could be maintained on t he bas i s of t he r pleadings, admi s sion and affi davit of the pa r t ies which neither provok e s any un s ettling qu es ti o n~ nor involves material factual i ss ues ue nuine ly in dispute. The administrativ e mac h i n ery or pr ocess employed on the right to the c laim s e ems to h a.v e .moved bar e ly at idling speed, To b e r e latively q u i e s c e n t f o r so me f o u r ( 4 ) y e 3 r s o n a c l a i n1 o f such a simple nature and no t s o cons id e r a ble a ~take which no longer i ncit es controv ers y n or excites a queasy sense of ex pe c t a ti on , c r ea t es \ 364
---- DEClSION - CTA CASES NOS. 3383 & 3578 ,. - 5- but an unwarranted bureaucratic inertia of inaction. Readily a legal conclusion can be safely reached. Petitioner or any similarly circumstanced taxpayer for that matter deserves a measure of fair dealing in a more expeditious a nd competently responsive action. (Commonwealth Pacific Consultants, Lt d ., v . Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CTA Case No . 2 9 5 3 , t~ a y 1 5 , 1 9 8 2 ) , " c i. t c c1 i n Da t 8 p r c p ( Ph i 1 s � ) Inc. v , Commis~:;ioner of Ir,L.ernnl Hcvcnue, ClA C<1ue No . 3600 , March 30, 1984; nppeul v1il: hdrawn, C.rt . L-67735, Se pt ember 12, 1984. The circumstances obtaining in the cases at bar of the mold no different from the aforccited , cases compel Us to sustain the tenability of the petitioner's right to the refund bRsed on t he pleadings and records. WHEREFORE, respond ent is hereby ordered to refund to the petitioner the amounts of !84 , ~~4.00 (CTA Case No . 3383) and el00,237.00 (CTA Case No. 3578), without pronouncement as to costs. \ 365
DECISION - CTA CASE S NOS . 3383 & 3578 - 6- SO ORDERED. Quezon City, Metro Manila, June 30 , 1987 . ~.~ AssociGte Judge WE CONCUR: '--- � ROAQUIN r Judge \ 36o
More in CTA Decisions
- MIFFI LOGISTICS CO., INC. V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9122)
- MISAMIS ORIENTAL RURAL ELECTRIC SERVICE COOPERATIVE, INC (MORESCO-I), v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (CIR)(CTA Case No. 10987)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. KURIMOTO (PHILIPPINES) CORP.,(CTA Case No. EB 2190)
- TAIAN (SUBIC) ELECTRIC, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6314)
- IBMS TECHNOLOGY PHILS. CORPORATION v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10606)
- PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10279)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. JOSELITO B. YAP (Prenza highway, District 1, Cauayan City, Isabela) [consol with O-669](CTA Case No. O-668)
- NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION v. MUNICIPALITY OF LAGUINDINGAN AND MUNICIPAL TREASURER OF LAGUINDINGAN, MISAMIS ORIENTAL(CTA Case No. EB 1293)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.