CTA Case No. 3189 (Decision)
REPUBLIC OF THE P.HILIPPIMES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY SMIT-LLOYD B.V., Petitioner, C.T.A. CASE NO. 3189 THE ACTING COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - X DE C I I This is a claim for ta:-: credit involving the amount of P422~058.94 representing alleged overpaid 8/. final ta~-~ ~.-.Ji thheld petitioner by Phi 1 i ppine - Ci ties Ser-vice, Inc. for the quar-ters ended December 31, 1978 and March 3 1~ 1979. Petitioner, Smit-Lloyd B.V., is a foreign corporation organized under the 1 a~"s of the Netherlands . It is engaged in the business as a resident international carrier in the Phi 1 ippines with business address a t Mar-y Bachrach Building, 25th Street~ Port Area~ Man i 1 a. It oper-ates a fleet of vesse l s of foreign registry that calls on Philippine ports at regular schedule. These vessel& are generally chartered principa lly to international oil companies to service the needs of their offshore oil drilling activities.
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3 1 89 - 2- Sometime on September 13, 1978~ petitioner entered into a charter party to provide supply vessels to Philippine - Cities Service~ Inc. which is engaged in petroleum exploration and development in the Philippines. The services include as follows: (a) Carrying s upplies on behalf of Philippine-Cities Service~ Inc. principally �from overseas to offshore platforms and drilling rigs to t1abini, Batangas; ( b ) Carr�ying personnel from overseas ports to offshore p l atforms and drilling rigs and vice-versa. In accor�dance li~i th said charter party agt-eement ~ payments were made to petitioner for the respective quarters ended December 31, 1978 and March 31, 1979. The total amounts of P456,467.10 and P410, 430.65, rept- esen ting the 8% f ina 1 ta:-: under P.O. 1354 were withheld petitioner by Philippine - Cities Service~ I nc. and paid to the BIR on January 25~ 1979 and 1979~ r�espec ti ve 1y. However, on June 28, 1979~ petitioner through its external auditor, SGV & Company, filed a formal c 1aim fot- ta:-: ct- ed it covering the above internal revenue tax payments~ alleging that i t had overpaid
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3189 the a bo ve - men tioned internal re v enue tax payments by three and one- half ( 3-1/2 ) per centum. It cited as l e gal basis BIR Ruling No. 023- 79 dated April 27~ 1979 holding S mit- Llo y d B.IJ.' as an intern ational carrier s ubject to the income ta x of 2 - 1/2% on its gross Philippine billings and to the 2% common ta }: pur�suan t to Sections 24 (b)(2) and 207 of the National Inte rnal Revenue Code of 1977 . It appearing from the records that respondent does not di s pute the afm-ementioned fa cts and in �fa c t failed to fil e his objection to the fat- ma l of "fer o"f evidences by petition er , pat- ties decided to s ubmit this case fat- decision on the basis of the pleadings a lready s ubmitte d. In view ther e of~ the i ssu e to be reso l ved in this particular case is wh e the r or not p e titioner is liable to the 8% final tax under P.O. 1354 , or to the 2- 1 / 2 % income ta x on i t s gross Philippin e billings and to the 2% common c: an- .ier�' s ta :-: under� Section s 24 (b) ( 2) a nd 207 of the Tax Code of 1977. Respondent maintains the app 1 icabi 1i t y of the provisions of P .O . 13 54, as follows: Imposi ng Final Income Ta:�: on Subcontractors and Alien Employees of Service Contractors and Subcontractors 5~7
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3189 - 4- Engaged in Petroleum Operations in the Philippines Under- Presidential Decree No. 87 SECTION 1 . Ta:{ on sub- contractors. - Every subco ntra ctor~ whether do me stic or foreign~ enteri ng into a contract with a service contractor engaged in petroleum operations in the Philippines s hall be liabl e to a final income tax equivalent to eig ht percent (8%) of its gross income derived from s uch contract, suc h tax to be in lieu of e:1 n y and all ta:�:es, whether national ot- 1 OC (31 : >! ~�~ X � On the other- hand, petitioner- cited Section 24 (b) (2) a nd 207 of the Nation al Internal Revenue Code, as follow s : Sec. 24. Rates of ta:�: on cor-por-ation s.-(a) x ( b) (1 ) (2) Resident corporations. - A cor-por-ation organized, authorized~ or- e}:isting under- the latt�IS of any for eig n country, engaged in trade or business within the Philippines, shal l be taxable as provided in su bsec tio n (a) of this sec tion upon the total net income received in the preceding ta xable year from all sources within the Philippines: Provided, however~ That international carriers shall pay a tax of two and one- ha 1 f per cent on the it- gross Phi 1 i ppine billings x x x. Sec. 207 . Percentage tax on carriers and kee pe r s of garages. - Keepers of garages, cars for rent or hire dri ven by th e 1 essees ~ tt-a n sporta tion con tt-ac tors, person who transpor-t passengers or freight for hire, and c ommon carriers by land, air~ or water, except owners of banc as and owners of animal-drawn two-
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3 189 - 5- wheeled vehicles~ shall pay a ta x equivalent to two per centum of their monthl y gross receipts. i s the principle that in case of co n �f 1 ic t beb"'een a spec ia 1 1 a~'-1 and a genet- a 1 1 aw the provision of the former shall prevail over that of the 1 at te r�� . Gen-e ralia Spe c ialibu s Hon Der o gant. Wher- e a 1 a ter- spec ia 1 l <::H'-1 on a par- ticu 1 ar subject is repugnant to, or in c onsi s tent wit h ~ a prior g e neral law on the s ubject, a partia l repeal of the latter ~'Jil l be implied to t h e extent of the repugnancy or an exception. grafted upon the general A special law must be intended to constitute an e::ception to t h e gene r- a 1 1 aw in the absence of spec ial c i r�cums t ances forcing a con c lusion. ( Nati o nal PoNer Cor p o rati o n vs . Hon. Pre s i d ing Judge, Pr ov in c e o f Hi s ami s Oriental , G.R . No. 72477~ October 16 ~ 1 990.) An examination o f t h e two l a ws wi l l show t h at the National Internal Revenue Code is a general l aw c ompared to F'residen tia 1 Decree No. 1 :354. t.rJh i 1e the former gover �ns in genera l ta xa tion of a ll ty pes o -F ind i v idu.a 1 s and cotr p ora te entities ~ the 1 at ter takes exce ption and treats especially the manner of ta:: .ing subcon tr�ac tor s and e mployees of s e r-..; i ce contractors and s ubcontractors engaged i n
DE C I S I O N CTA CASE NO . 3 189 - 6- petroleum operation. Therefo re~ based on the a for�e -- men tioned do c trin e~ the prov ision of Presidential Decree No. 1354 should prevail. This cone lusion becomes more apparent if we will take note of the fact that Presidential Decree No. 1354 n?cogn i zes in it:~. opening para.g raph t h at "for-eign subcontractors invol�.;ed in petroleum o pE-!ra tion s in the P h ilippines are ta:.: able as resident for-eign corporation". In other words~ the lav~m aker v~a ~.:; that foreign subcontractors e nga.ged in petroleum operations were ta:.:ed as resident foreign corporation under Section 24(b)(2) of the Tax Code including entities engaged in international carr� iage the subject prr.:'}s i dential decr�ee wa�::; promulgated. T he purpose therefo re of the law is to take away from the �provision of said section of the National Internal Revenue Code, foreign subcontractors involved in petn:J I eu. m oper��a tions by ho 1ding them 1 iab 1e to a s p e cia l rate of 8% of its gros s income derived from .its co n tt~ac t 11-1i th a service contr�ac tor� e n gaged in petr�o I eu.m oper�a tion . Had the intention been to e xc lude internationa l carriers, this should have been specified but the 1 a\1-J remains si 1 en t and in fact did not distinguish. Al so, nowhere under said presidentia l decree ~~~as i t the intention of the
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3189 - 7- lawmaker to give preferential treatment to foreign subcontractor. The intention was merely "to s implify the method of taxing the sai d foreign subcontractors x x so as to insure the col l ection of \r�Jhatever t a}: i s due from them." (5th p a r-ag tr aph of the ~lhereas C 1 ause) . Another purpose is to place domestic subcontractor on equal footing with foreign subcontractor 1r~hich we shall discuss below. Furthermore~ please take note that one of the main purpose for the issuance of P. D. 1354 is "To plac e loca l or domestic subcontractors on equal footing and to make them competitive with foreign subcontt- ac tors, they should simi l at- 1y be taxed as foreign subcon trac tot-s". (6th paragr-aph of the Whereas Clause.) In accordance with the objective, Secticm 1 of P.O. 1354 that ?P I::J ~o r:J .tr:.S\c;::tq_r::, ..... ..... "-~hether dome:?..tic .. CJr e ntering into contract with a service contr-actor e ngaged in petro 1eum operations in the Philippines s ha 11 be 1 iab 1 e to a f ina 1 income ta:�: equivalent to eight percent (8%) of its gross income deri '-"ed from such contract, such tax to be in lieu of any and all ta xes , whether national 01r local" (Underscoring supplied) . If ~t-Je will follow the position taken by the petitioner and 56~ .
DECIS ION CTA CASE NO. 318 9 - 8- concur tJ.Ji th the cited BIR opinion holding petitioner liable to pay only 2-- 1/2% ta~: on gross Phi 1 i ppine bi 11 ing s p 1 us 2% common carrier's ta:-:, the purpose of the 1 a1--1 wi 11 be defeated b eca use domestic s ubcontr-act or- engaged in s imilar s ubcon tract of lease or charter of vessel can never be s ubject to the lo11~er 2-1/2 on gross Philippine billings. Thi s 1 OtJ.Ier ta x rate app 1 ies on 1y to resident �foreign cor-�porations. Clear- l y , the intention of the 1 atJ-1 ~ P. D. 1 35 4 in a.pp 1 y ing a s i mi 1 ar 8% ta}: on both, domesti c and foreign, i s to place them on e qual focJ ting in ter-ms of winning a s ubcontract agreement with a contractor engaged in petroleum operations. To rule othe r wise is to plac e a domestic subcontractor- at a disadvantage vis-a-v i s a foreign s ubcontractor. Mor--eover, if ~~~E.' will examine closely the activities of the vessels of the petitioner emp loy e d in the operation 114hich we quote as fo 11 0\-'IS: 1. Cat- r-y ing s upp 1 ies on beha 1 f of Philippine- Cities Service, Inc. pt--i n c ipally from ov erseas ports to offshore platforms and d r i l ling rig s and to Mabini~ Batangas which is the s upply base of companies engaged in oil e::ploration and development and r�e l ated activities. These supplies c:on~::;ist o nly of tho se items which are necessa ry to sustain an offshore 5h?
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3189 - 9- p1~tr-oleum e}: p 1 or-ation or- pi~oduc tion oper-ation. Supplies include but ar-e not 1 imi ted to: f oo d, ~'iater- ~ fuel~ bulk cement an d dr-illing fluids, dr-illing and logging tools and equipment; and 2. C<i: n�� y ing per-sonnel �fr- o m ove r-seas po,- ts to of �fshot- e p 1 at fot-ms an d dr-illing r-igs and v ice- versa. We can conc lude that the se activities are not c: ove r��e d by the phr- ase "gr- oss Phi 1 i ppine bi 11 ings" being taxed at 2-1/2% under Section 24(b)(2) of the Ta:-: Code. The law de �fines "Gr� oss Phi 1 ippine Billings" as gr-� oss r��evenue n:~alized fr-o m uplifts anywhere in the world b y any internat ion a l carrier doing business in the Philippines of passage c:loc:u rnent s s old ther-ein~ Nhet h er- for- passenger� , The gr-oss r-evenue r- eali ze d fr- o m the sai d car-go or- mail includes the gr-oss freight c har-ge up to fin a l destina t ion. ''Gr.:.CJs'=!...Cht..Li.PP.:i:..D..�!.. J3.ilJ..i,.rJ9?." r-egar�dless of the place of sale or- pa y ment of the passa ge documents. For- pur�poses of de ter-m in ing the ta ::a bi 1 i t y of r�evenu.es fr� o rn char-te r-ed flight s ~ the i tenn "gr.::i.ginc;~.:t::i.og _ f .r �qm i:.hf:?.. .F'lt:i.Jippif'le__s" sba ll. . Jnc tudE?.. :flj._g _ll:t.. p:f p@._ssgnger.:.?. 11:1ho ....? t.<o:~y __) ,1:1 _ t,he__ _Phi lippin?s. _fgr. . __mp_r:_e __ j; h~n ...:fP.r:t:.Y.:: ... P r- :i, q r::__ . J:9... . _.. em.P.~-r.J::..a t:Jgn" �
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3189 - 10 - (Underscoring supplied) Please note that while the service activities of the vesse ls of petitioner s peaks of carrying suppli es and pe rsonn e l from ove l-- sei3.s ports to of f s hor�e p 1at forms and dr i 11 ing rigs and to t'labini ~ Batangas, the gross revenue c ontem plated under the phrase "gross Philippine billings" speaks of cargo, mai l or char�tered flights originating from the Philippines, a complete reverse of the aforementioned activities. Considering a ll the above j urisp rudence and objectives of the l al-'J, the Court concludes that ~~~hat the petitioner h as done in paying the 8/. tax purs uant t o P.D. 1354 is in order. WHEREFORE, the instant Petition for Review is hereby dismissed. The claim for tax credit is consequent 1y c:i.I!'!Di.!?.c:i.. No pronouncement as to costs. SO ORDERED. Quezon City, Metro Manila, November 1991. ~~~~ ERNESTO D. ACOSTA Associate Judge I CONCUR:
- DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3 189 - 11 - CERT I F I CAT I 0 N I that this decision was reached after due consultation between the members of the Court of Tax Appeals in accordance with Section 1 3 ~ Article VIII of the Constitution . .j tt: "l !I . '--...._ ANT;(' C . ROAQU IN ssociate Judge C urt of Tax Appea l s
More in CTA Decisions
- BENCHMARK MARKETING CORP., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2212)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-14 (Decision)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-14)
- FORT 1 GLOBAL CITY CENTER, INC., v. HON.CAESAR R. DULAY, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (consol with 9503)(CTA Case No. 9490)
- CTA Case No. 4571 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4571)
- NISSAN MOTOR PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5545)
- LEO MARIO CELDRAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8722)
- CENTRAL METRO DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. HON. COMMISSIONER GUILLERMO T. PARAYNO, JR., HON. ESTRELLA V. MARTINEZ(CTA Case No. EB 179)
- WESTCHESTER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 127)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.