[ G. R. No. 41812. May 29, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41812. May 29, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41812
[ G. R. No. 41812. May 29, 1934 ]
JOSE DIVINAGRACIA, PETITIONER AND APPELLANT VS. THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF BULUSAN, SORSOGON, ET AL., RESPONDENTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________29th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the dispositive part of the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Sorsogon________, dated the __________22nd__________ day of __________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-four____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, with the costs of this instance against the appellant.
It is further ordered that xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________ recover from xx__________xx__________xx__________ the sum of Pxx__________xx , as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 76733. June 30, 1989 ](256 Phil. 374)
- G.R. No. 137650, April 12, 2000
- [ G.R. No. 124739. April 15, 1998 ](351 Phil. 1046)
- [ G.R. NO. 165849. December 10, 2007 ](564 Phil. 540)
- [ G. R. No. 40597. September 28, 1934 ]
- G.R. No. 202039, August 14, 2019
- [ G.R. No. 89217. September 04, 1991 ](278 Phil. 302; 88 OG No. 11, 1428 (March 16, 1992))
- [ G.R. No. 124100. April 01, 1998 ](351 Phil. 827)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.