CTA Decisions CTA Case No. 719719 1961-12-08
CTA Case No. 719 (Decision)
� 71 �� r � 7 ). 0 ( 1 ( l� ,, 359
� 71 - -� .. I' c . . ...... , E 'x ' 360
7l.. - 3- 361
t c .2 tt 0 .1 1 ' r t �- 0 . .. t ' t 0 ct ro y c � ) 3 362
- 5- l � at 1t v tl i 3 63
719 -6 - t or o� v . t ~ p ,.. l:" h. G) rr of � t no l.i h � Lt� t o .. of t .... ~ ~ 1 ... r t 0� t~ c -1 t ct s ..;, r. , t ....,.. f t.: t. �r J . ct 191 . ... ... . � t. ~ 0 al ..: � . r i l' cti 19~ t li 'o � t � a w CD e t � n- ' c 1 R.l ' ..., 6 L;It. 4)
"�' IoiO o. '71 c� � � - 7 ... � 0 _h. .,. � 3 ' 19 0) . , ., � L-l h t ' t � r 1 y t 1 � t 1 p rb � t - I , - � 1t 1 l. 365
More in CTA Decisions
- RITEGROUP INCORPORATED VS. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8651)
- DHL SUPPLY CHAIN PHILS., INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10722)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PREMIUMLEISURE AND AMUSEMENT, INC. (PLAI)(CTA Case No. EB 2226)
- CALAMBA PREMIER REALTY CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9541)
- CTA Case No. 6319 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6319)
- ACER PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8372)
- TAGANITO MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9057)
- CTA Case No. 3497 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3497)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.