CTA Case No. 2666 (Resolution)
REPUBLIC .01' THE PHILIPP1M&a COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZ~N CITY PHILIPPINE FRUITS ENTERPRISES, Necitas Desiderio, Proprietor, Petitioner, - versus - C.T.A. CASE NO. 2666 THE HONORABLE CO~~ISSIONER OF CUS'I'OMS, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - X RE S0 LUT I 0 N Considering the lack of interest on the part of petitioner to prosecute its appeal as manifested by failure of its counsel to appear at the scheduled hearing of this case on February 15, 1980, the motion to dismiss of respondent for non-suit is hereby GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Quezon City, February 27, 1980 � � ~AQUIN AMANTE LLER Acting Presiding Judge e Judge
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 3955 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3955)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. SWEE KIM TAN GO No. 131 A. Flores Street San Pablo City, Laguna (conso with O-878)(CTA Case No. O-877)
- CTA Case No. 1653 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1653)
- BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE represented by COMMISSIONER KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES vs. HON. LEILA M. DE LIMA in her capacity as SECRETARY OF JUSTICE, GEORGE ERWIN M. GARCIA(CTA Case No. EB 1694)
- FIRST INOSLUBAN PRIME, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8148)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. WATSONS PERSONAL CARE STORES (PHILIPPINES), INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2391)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK(CTA Case No. EB 1615)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. MASTER SPEED SHOE BAGS ENTERPRISES and RITO ALAYON JARDELIZA(CTA Case No. O-898)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.