CTA Case No. 261 (Decision)
KP lULl G Oil' C U.HI' o~ T TI et1t1oner, - v rsua - � T. � � 261 L �- tapon - - -- - -- -- D CI l bts la an a peal eetslon of respon� nt Collector of Int�r e asaesalng and and1 fr petition r ol Lan Transport tion c ency 1nC t ears 194~ to 1 1, luslv , in the g egate nt of 167,07 � s f ct r , including su.r- � , co pr lse pe al y ln erest. et1t1oner bol Land Transportation ( er inafter efer e to as hol C any for ~�- 1 y) is a s c cor rat! enga ed the 1 ainesa wit a1n offices a [ agb � t hol. 19�5 tbru 1 l , petit! r had c t � inc tax returns d paid the c rrespo tax a e thereon as per sal eturns. ver , te.r exa !nation and , r!- fication of the afo~ ntloned returna, respon nt Coll ctor of Internal ev n e ( r nafter referre to �� t ollector for � ort) aaued deficiency <l � 48 6
� 261 - 2- inc ax asse a nt gatnst ohol Co pany, h1eh the latter receiv d on epte r 1, 1953. Theso de- ficiency 1nco � tax asses nt ar detailed as fol- lowas 11 4456 11~ , 27~. I�X � ����iIR re�c. 1947 ���� 1948 . 768. 1l 950 !. 11 , 732. � 20,711. 9 � l ,.712~58..2091 � �� 1951 , 189. (figures �r� exelus ve of ~oaiae penalty � ept eaber 11, 19~3 (E � �A� l� � p. 21, t A ree.) l �o.pany requested the Coll�ctor to fur� n1a fo~r with t~ etalls of the d1screpan- ctes an d!sallo..nces �� stated� n the aforesaid notices or the years 1 ~ 1 1. r l, 9 petitioner receiv ans r, d t epte 13, 1954, 1t..la1n d�talls of the latter�� eftciency �����...nt in question ( � �2", p. 22, CT. rtc.J see ala Exh. �9 � � 148- 15 to ll.21 1 54 (E at for , Cl r c. ) � hol .~ouu.Jany ote a r econ&i~rat1on of th aforeaa~ ������ en � On ov er 22, 19~ ( itted, par. l , nawer), p ti- ceiv d respon � �a er to said request, v~ 16, 1954 ( xh. �1o� , p. 167. IR r c. ), 1Dfo~1ng the for r tha retnv�st!gation .auld conditioned on p tltioner'� compliance of Depart nt er o. 21 of the Depart nt of flnance , dated 487
for t f.on po n t 111 ible ap al ( xh. -7 � ~ v, n te � or r � h 11 ~0 1 t id � � ,_ l ctor � � ...( xh� ol tt -11" . � � 19 ( � t n� ret � r c.) , t! I cto r 2 , 9~ ( X � 48 ---~-"
� T.A. E . � 261 �4� t e Collector urged the Deputy Provincial Tre eurer of hol to ex dite th execution of the warrant of dtstr nt n levy issu d ag in t hol Company an r port t � act on t en in thi re ct !thin 1 d y fro receipt of aaid letter. nee. on ove r 12, 1 5~ (Exh. �A-12.. � p. 70 , Ct ree.), petition r ote th rovi c 1 Tr asurer of ol, c no 1 ing r c pt of pond nt' lett r of to r 2 , 1 ~. nd r qu t n th the execut!o of the nt o 1 tr lnt and le y tay d until the former's tition for r consi- ra ion ct d upon. s for rd d t h Col! ctor ho , n ec r 28 , 19 5 ( � � � �13 � 71, CT rec.) � n1 t fo.r reeon id ration. Thla d nial ce v d hol ! of Ja 1 ~ a d con - ently, ta proper~! s re pl ce n r d tr int nd levy ( � 314, rec.). ub ently. r nt s th D ty ovinc f. 1 T:re sur r of hol to 11 t publ c ct!on t prop rt s of p t t oner th n un e dis ra t (p. 31!>, Ift rec.). n he ant � on erch e. 19~6. th Collect iiSUI to the v r ou anks in an!la warrent of rn s nt a atnst th cash deposit � on y , credit or rights to t n l or int n 1ble ro rt1e of ohol C pany hlch ay in po session or control of se1d ank � a a result of these arr nts of garnia nt t cash '� t189
26 pee its oh 1 C p ny ith Ch t d Bank of Indta. � c � in the 0 t Philippin attonal ank , unt f ~3, 10. 1 � garnf.a d nt, p. lg , I r c.). A pet1tl er 1nst!tut d th el null nd v 1d th ����� enta to 19 � 1ncluaive; (2) .to cl vo d ur~t of 1stra1nt nci levy, ) to d - 11 t h niah ents ff ct d y re po t t 1 $ of o ol C P ny; (4) t l nd nc:o uti nal nt � 213 0 t t of ... ance , at 2. 1 �. y 7, 1 � respo ent 1 alieglng bv y of speelal � ens� �t �t t � e ax ret rn fll � er 0 eu 0 1951, nclu v � � taln � t � - an fir lve fena � t ti 1 tj ction to t ,f t tition 0 r 1 or he reaao ha 11 �� c y nd t ay per! ~ n nt' cl t he re r � 19~. � My � � tit oner il t!on to eel � I' n nt n efa lt, hie enltd thls ourt o t � ~ un tha r n nt' ns r ha� alr ady en led. ..
� �f 1 of v �' 4 91 LJ 99
- � 261 - 7- y �� 11 � t un1 nt di� d a, Aus :r:alia t t c tered ch, lv � t t0 le v!ng s1t. wlt t tl 1 1n nt �� n1 ar inter st of t r � . ar l 5 ��.. ( 1 , CTct to tt 1 tlo f t � J' c.) t tly, Co ina n, a.ry 21, 1 57, lare wit � d ef eet t rt vy 11 n 1 c !r� � 1c 1 e X v� - � f � 1nt at � d! . in (� ). 1 � g sp � t y ev y �- � inc:orr c � s t19 2
� 261 -8- eflcle cy !nc � tax ����� nts with res ct to tbe years 194 to 1 f'JO, tnclua1ve. in vie of its t ory that it uld �aater ally jeopardit th tn- at tereat of petitio ~ thia at� of the proce dings to offer evi � ce 1n ta defe �� w t out ny for al pleading tn a ju 1eial c lo y the ret nt or claim or to 1nst1t te ti for h coll ction of � 1c1ency ax � or y ars l 5 o � 161-163, y S, 1957). ence, et1t1oner 1 itt tta ev enc to the ctione 1n ita 1nc tax return� for 1 1 aff ct1ng foll in laallo d t as ����������� .2 ���� Upon the other ba � it s uld n te t t rea n en � ,in hie anner. all ed y w y of ffir - tlve efense (l) that t r t 1 f11 d y petitioner fo t � years i 4~ to 951. lncl � ve, � taint with fraudJ an (2) t a this o t h no juris lc- tio to ar t 11 c n t e o hat h at nt ppeal was file out of t � the fore otng aete,� oll 1ng are t � atn 1sauea o reaolve a f t er or ~ot thla Court has ju1a lction to eter in t in- stant c���J aecon � whether or not respon nt�a r1 ht to ������ nd/or collect t eftc!ency inc tax for the years 1 45 to 19 1ncl a!ve , �� prescrlb dJ third. ether o not present ct! 1� suff1c1ent to conatt- 493 49t
- cD.Cr.IS � E � 261 - - :) tute J d cial ctton for the coll ction of taxes herein involv J and fourth , ho tUCh , if any, is the defici n y inc tax lia !11 y of ohol �o - ' p ny for th y 1 45 to 1 ;>l , clu ve? ith ap ct t o the fir t 1 � find that the Coll ctor no effort to co. out ith vi� dence in upport of hia cl th t th n tant app al is not eeanon bl � In f ct , r pond nt ms to h v totally aban oo d id {{ n not only f iled t discus th ntion atso r d d f n e in hi u � On th otter han t t tion for ev all g d f eta uf- . ficiel"lt o con er ourt ( � 1-15, juri diction on t 1& t t for v ) ch eta r rc y - tt n n r. Con- ntly, r llin no uff ci nt evi nc to r ut itio r �a lle tion of eta which ar ffic n o conf r this ourt r 0 the op - nion, Juri iction to 1c on it � ll n oc to p pon t cond nt 1u 0 ether or t r:f. ht of t t e Vor collect t fici cy inco t y ara 1 5 0 1 iv , apr cr � con rin t t y r or th n thre yea.rs af the c rr r fil d by petition r. It 1 n 11- t t t t 1e t ver period prov by ct on 1 (d) of h T X 1 it n the 115881 ent nd coll ction of !nco. t X ., 1!) ! t/'16
� 2l -l - ref r rely t th ~o11 t ., � y � ever, t he gove , fter � . lap � of a! peri � ay � 11 c llec 1 c1n ( peala, � � � ar 3~ J oJ.leeto va . l!:no , l v 1- � l ...7; 1 e or v � Zulue , �o. � 1 57} . oll t vs. o. l ov in 0 t p 10 ion w h ch judie! 1 coll ctlo of t xes ay - d $4Ctio � 331 nt :r:n v ue Code. In c e � er urn 1 ed, "int rna e ta - �� � !thin y l1" f :r: h fil� � 1, oce in court t � 11 ue ft r t � expu t1 uch ..>ec 1on X 0 ).. t er no e '"u n 11e or als r IU ulent turn nt to v � t t X ay �r in court for uch y as s en , t any t 1th1n t t f lsity, fr or l ). r x Co � � 0 v :r:, � 1 n e ass nt o y in� it in v nu x the.reo na in f t 0 0 it t!on t ov � � ch t X " y pr e odin court, t ly if un it year a he 5 s nt f h tX 2 (c) , T X ). "'l �� <l95
� 261 - 11 - o ing to the ca at ar , reapondent lleged th t the r turns file by pet! ion r f r the years 1945 to 19~1 were taint d 1th frau 1th inten to ev � the tax. o ver, eon& derlng1 aa !a lerein- aft r diacu d, that � find th evi c in uff!- clont or unsatiaf ctory to ~ o a findin th t peti- tion r filed fal or froudul nt returnG ith intent to eva t tax, are con traine to r j c res- pon ent �s co tention of apply1n the pr cri t ve perio o ten (10) y r pr cr d 1n ct1on 32 (a} ccordingly hold th t the statute of 1 1ta- t1on of fiv (5) y ar prov1 ed by s ct on 3 1 o ld a ply to lti r ' co tax ret rna o t � y r 1 4 o 1 ol. r er no d ' ut th o ol C ny d co al - t ntly en fil1n ts co for th y s 19 o 19 1 nd that th Collector th eorr G on - ing ic cy a aase nta th r� ly n u st 4 a. ctlon 331 o ode, nt at eov r only t 1 c te. turns f r 1 cluai n fo cor- h th r- in9 to t !nco tax � ld fore 1 at th al ty. ����� yo the th � ur for th for n- counting fro the t1oned years re fll � follo t tt C 1- lector ay no long r validly collect eit u- mary r judie 1 proc s, th 11 ged n y co � o nny fo t 496 r 1 to 1 7.
� 261 - 12- are1 t erefore,of t opini n. an 1 � that r a- pondent has le al a thority to collect tbr ju ie "al action only he alle d � ic � cy co 0 t s of - � nc1u iv � p titionor or he y a.ra l to �� � caus the s h d va ly � e � i till the .P riod pre cri d by ecti n 1. ith re pee lo tn thir issue, ohol 0 p ny contend& th sine "th pre nt p t:lt n 1 n or revi rou t no y t 1 yt by th� t. xpayer.," th oll or u t jud - cial action for c 1ectiun f taxe - volve in proceed! P r nt of the . tnat n � 0r cc di: J.� t oner, 0 revl ah ld ot flrta as 1 n to t j dici 1 cti cont .� 2( ) 0 ax ode r t col- ec tax. e f n �this theory not ell te en. I'he J d1ci 1 CtiOI � eo. t 0 ci i l c s u1 tit t ed y t ov r� nt to col- lect th ax t lso t c s 1h r th t xp y r t �� t in1tiat1v to cont t th v lidity of the of \ev nu � The o jeetive in oth c s G th ��t � validity and corr ctn as of e d ter- lnati n and c llect!on of the tax. Thus, a si ple cl 1a fil d by the ollector of I t rn 1 v nu a ain t th state of a d c as d �n a probate cas has co ize s tant unt to t judicial col- l c tio of t xes ( ollector vs. nn!e Laurie H ygo � 6 Phil. 520l. th other hand. in claim for r - 497
� 261 - 13 - 1 f n 1nst1tut d a ainst t e Coll ctor of Intern 1 � nu � t Court const r t t xpayer� � uff cien �ju ic! 1 ct!on or auit for r f nd t c l ct n of t on t rt of the (��� fbll. uga �st1te Dev. o., nc. v � o � btl. 2l6). I � � on the s e �� f � thi t,. C nat furt r th t t vo �r nt d n upon t cell t f � l!�v � it coul not h 0 0- � � 1n the ere tlo of ,is Court t r t Col- 49
1 1 51. c �t lc! .. 499
� 261 .. 15 - ved bo ver. that in ap1te f th 11 e n� ing aug eatt n o the C urt . c nsel f r pttiti ner r~fu � to adduce ev1 en proving the alle e incor- rect eas of esp nd nt ' a as a enta ag inat pet - tio er f tr the taxa le years 9 to 19 � tnclus ve . It i& a 11 � tablia rul tb t X nts � are pre u t!v ly cor ct. b nc 0 8$ 11& thou con tne s h $ t � urd n ~ ty to prove th t t he taid as east nts are rron us. ( u en to r % v � Court o� fax pp ls e o. L� l � ay ~ . 1 57; t r rovinctal uto Co� � I c . vs. Coll ct.or . G�� o. L� 741. ~anu 31, 1 ~6.} or v ou rea ons. t r fora . � shall di c s tb ~1 e s ant ~ p toly p oed tu c on der the def te :l.ney nt co er.ing t y r s 1 4a t o 19~ nc !ve. Con �dcrin th t p i i on r h s f i l d to point o t the error� of rea ondent. - atr 1 d ~o �leav ndistu b d th ction f th .L ttor in di !lowing c rta n n la .d oy the for :r in ta 1nc t X tur ns f r t h ye � 19 and 1� not t h t Co ol C ny app ntl y ct d o d fa h cl a t ln t � d d ct � on nd int � v l ve ~ n n ho spute 0 �� s di ll o d elat Cl n 1 48. 1 49 and 19 � in � c t s. i l or analogous to t oee deductio a c � rcinaf t er discus& d. cons dor for tho y ar 1 51 �~ p... op r d .. ductions in titi ner�a tnc . X urns . or OV � it ay a~n inti f i d f� 11o de- ducttona or 1948. l ob .in y .h~ 500 tl?t:J
1 '< 50t
� 261 � 17 - The Coll t or ai all t unt of 3. on hi f 1n s t'at 1 s t � 1� 1� 1 nc of th r rv for c lla 1� l tt or 19~1 in t - po � t , tre 1 th nt sr r to co r con in t li ility, 1sall t$ n t theory that ounta d p &it in a � � erve to o r co tin nt 11 ilit y ot t1 � ch ltabilitle co c t sup- y t �ollector 0 l r- ~t�' t titio to t f cor f tot 1 cr d!t 1n 1 1 fo 111ty" nd tr for t lly nt for d � it tf 19 1 fo r 502
� 261 - 18 - firs - h l f f t y r 1 :.>1 nd ohol Co pany having ae ually th~n 5 , 33.71 to c o r d s. hospit 1 nd f OS t o 1 gated c find t expl nat on o p tit on fo nd h a ount 0 nd 1ch agr it count in cords su flciently r - is of t t St ltS t � d uction. re � thar ~ io � ore. o t. � ld. t h t o ol c ny for i c t x purpo t uction n o ol c t.x r tur f r l9ol. thot 1 t 0 . 71. xp n s cl uct y 1 r e 1951. t:h Coli . ctor 1 0 h ount of a � � t i- up- 1 n 0 y ht 1 part repl c nts t t � y tr t � 1 t� auld � c liz j hr no �0 nt invol e � titio r con- 11 ca c u ��t� � pr c 0 r. �1 un of t titi er nt 0 'I n incl nt 1r of it 0 lntain 1n rliy - lei nt o � ~� n co ttion. enc � et 1 ar u h t t 503
1� CAS- � 261 -1 - 1 t ate n &s expens and should all d ct 0 - . n bj ct of repl c ents. ove nt rep e �� deduct! n � ttMt stand t rity o c � J'acob � ertens d ot : fG
- - � 2 1 � 505
c.r.ISA.l �n r, � 261 - 21 .. unting to 8 , 174. I w rely t o keep pet1- tioner' s ve ic le 1n eff c ! nt opeaating condition and i s cordingl y t � nature of a m nt en ce charge , a pu � alien to t e xtens!on or pro� longat t on of 1 fe f p t�t�one~ � s v t e l ~" his cone ua re po failure t~ s ow t t t he pose and eff ct t place ta e ot r han a proved y .. l ieve t at o 1 aa a .bU 9 t l u of ex nae r s lot anuf ct r n o. v. C ev. , he o er 1 �e cuedin ha c in u0 ghich nts the .6 1 f el a oil nt th el ctr c pl y tit on r �a n nc ho � Th c th t the ount of 144. 66 con t tut fu 1 d oil con u e in conn ct:lon ith t � lnt n nc of h 1nt n nc nd r p hop of ohol ny, he 1 11 � t.a co $t t t dc x- p n~ s b i09 O?-d1nary and n ces~ r � In r au f nd petit on r ot 1 bl for defie ncy co � t x s for the ye r 19 5, l 46 d 1947 c us t eir a nt nd collection h b en barred y th stat t of 1tat1ons ( ecs. 331 and 32oft T xCod ) , to Sect n 14 of epubl c ct o. 112 , th r 0 c ncy n resp ct of suc h tax � th r f ci cy nco t x sses nt for th y r 1 4 � 1 9 nd 1 50 , no evidene having b en ddue d t o d&stroy t he 506
� 2I -22- eorr r pon n �a et � n d � t in sai y � 0 f c cy tX t r to, or t 1 yr o v r, c th �d ne di close tp not for 1 4S. lfully 0 fr t y not 1 9. ndl � 1n nt r p nt of � 1� � �r ect tl Tax Co � I � it 11 rt 0 12. d� cc X 1�
CI � 261 � r� � CJ - 23 - c � o nd 1 1~ m t) p ct o th c m- r P n lty 0 . 2 .oo. . E. . t deci on app 1 ..r sho ld b � 8$ lt h r b � odlf d , nd th p t;a.t 0 r 1 - er d to pay to th Cellector o In n l v th r. of 46,3~ 6. ~ s defic i ncy nco t for t ye s 1948 , ";4 � n l. r.: � ~it out s c 1 pron ~ to cost. � � � la, J 1 1 p no , pt � � 50
More in CTA Decisions
- H. TAMBUNTING PAWNSHOP, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 68)
- CTA Case No. 150 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 150)
- ACESITE (PHILIPPINES) HOTEL CORPORATION, v. LIBERTY TOLEDO, in her capacity as CITY TREASURER OF MANILA and THE CITY OF MANILA(CTA Case No. EB 946)
- AIR CANADA v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 86)
- CTA Case No. 853 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 853)
- CTA Case No. 4099 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4099)
- PILIPINAS TOTAL GAS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 674)
- CITY ASSESSOR?S OFFICE OF VALENZUELA CITY, REP. HEREIN BY THE CITY ASSESSOR, ATTY. CECILYNNE R. ANDRADE v. NATIONAL GRID CORPORATION OF THE PHILIPPINES AND CENTRAL BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS(CTA Case No. EB 2100)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.