[ G. R. No. 40527. August 10, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40527. August 10, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40527
[ G. R. No. 40527. August 10, 1934 ]
UY BICO ET AL, .PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. IGNACIO ARROYO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________25th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Iloilo________, dated the _________15th__________ day of __________August_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs of both instance against the plaintiffs-appellants.
It is further ordered that the said cause be remanded to the Court of First Instance.
More in SC Decisions
- A.M. No. P-01-1454 (Formerly AM No. 00-11-556-RTC), September 12, 2002
- G.R. No. 252267, January 11, 2021
- G.R. No. 169438, January 21, 2010
- G.R. No. 164267, March 31, 2009
- [ G. R. No. 9489. September 11, 1915 ]
- [ G.R. No. 136603. January 18, 2002 ](424 Phil. 844)
- [ G.R. No. 4871. December 10, 1909 ](G.R. No. 4871)
- G.R. No. 230221, April 10, 2019
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.