[ G. R. No. 37636. June 09, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37636. June 09, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37636
[ G. R. No. 37636. June 09, 1934 ]
JULIAN TAMAYO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. GRACIANO BARCENA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________24th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Abra________, dated the __________16th__________ day of _________October____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with cost for this instance against the appellant.
It is further ordered that the __________the appellee_________from the _________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G. R. No. 39922. June 14, 1934 ]
- [ A.C. No. 8658. April 24, 2017 ](809 Phil. 206)
- G.R. No. 247624, June 16, 2021
- [ G.R. No. 117964. March 28, 2001 ](407 Phil. 856)
- [ G.R. No. 85517. October 16, 1992 ](289 Phil. 241; 90 OG No. 27, 3840 (July 4, 1994))
- [ G.R. No. L-17115. November 30, 1962 ]
- [ G.R. No. 170912. April 19, 2010 ](632 Phil. 402)
- [ G. R. No. 5826. September 23, 1910 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.