[ G. R. No. 40950. August 10, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40950. August 10, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40950
[ G. R. No. 40950. August 10, 1934 ]
SABINO SELAC ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. PASAY TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.,DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________25th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Manila_________, dated the _________25th__________ day of __________September_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 129744. June 26, 1998 ](353 Phil. 631)
- G.R. No. 215175, April 25, 2022
- [ G. R. No. 41826. May 29, 1934 ]
- [ G.R. No. 39593. November 27, 1933 ](G.R. No. 39593)
- [ G.R. No. L-16779. March 30, 1921 ]
- [ G.R. No. 209843. March 25, 2015 ](757 Phil. 326)
- [ A.M. No. CA-08-45-J (Formerly OCA IPI No. 08-130-CA-J). February 22, 2010 ](627 Phil. 111)
- [ G.R. No. 123905. June 09, 1997 ](339 Phil. 349)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.