[ G. R. No. 39608. August 09, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39608. August 09, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39608
[ G. R. No. 39608. August 09, 1934 ]
DIRECTOR OF LANDS, PETITIONER, VS. AQUILINA VDA. DE ABAD ET AL., CLAIMANTS, HEIRS OF ESTEBAN PARAS, CLAIMANTS AND APPELLANTS, MARIA VIDUA DE ARRIAGA, CLAIMANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________18th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Cebu________, dated the __________30th__________ day of __________January_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with cost in this instance against the appellants.
It is further ordered that __________xx__________xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ recover from __________xx__________xx__________ xx__________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. NO. 173858. July 17, 2007 ](554 Phil. 683)
- [ G.R. No. 230831. September 05, 2018 ](839 Phil. 1108)
- G.R. Nos. 218485-86 and 218493-97, April 28, 2021
- [ G.R. No. 148193. January 16, 2003 ](443 Phil. 454)
- [ G.R. No. L-32170. March 31, 1971 ](148 Phil. 381)
- G.R. No. 120367, October 16, 2000
- [ G.R. No. 2153. November 23, 1905 ](G.R. No. 2153)
- [ G.R. No. 151158. August 17, 2007 ](557 Phil. 260)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.