[ G.R. No. 1228. March 10, 1903 ]
[ G.R. No. 1228. March 10, 1903 ]
[ G.R. No. 1228. March 10, 1903 ]
JUAN ARANETA, PETITIONER, VS. THE HEIRS OF TRANQUILINO GUSTILO, RESPONDENTS.
D E C I S I O N
LADD, J.:
This is a petition for a writ of certiorari to review the action of the Court of First Instance of Occidental Negros in requiring a supersedeas bond under section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It does not appear from the petition what the amount involved in the litigation is, nor in what sum the bond was fixed by the court, but it is alleged that the bond is excessive. The court below had jurisdiction to require the bond as a condition of a stay of execution, and to fix its amount. Assuming that the bond was excessive, yet nothing is alleged in the petition which shows that the court exceeded its jurisdiction in the premises or committed any irregularity in its proceedings in exercise thereof. The writ must therefore be denied. (Code of Civil Procedure, sections 514, 217, 220.) So ordered.
Arellano, C. J., Torres, Cooper, Willard, and Mapa, JJ., concur.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 222428. February 19, 2018 ](826 Phil. 329)
- [ G.R. No. 104769. September 10, 2001 ](417 Phil. 250)
- A.M. No. P-11-2950 (Formerly A.M. No. 11-6-62-MCTC), January 17, 2012
- G.R. No. 141115, June 10, 2003
- G.R. No. 232666, June 20, 2018
- [ G.R. No. 59879. May 13, 1985 ](221 Phil. 104)
- G.R. No. 261857, May 29, 2024
- [ A.M. No. MTJ-93-746. December 27, 1994 ](309 Phil. 384)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.