[ G. R. No. 40968. August 15, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40968. August 15, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40968
[ G. R. No. 40968. August 15, 1934 ]
NICOLAS LAPUZ., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. ALEJANDRO RANCE, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________28th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Tayabas_________, dated the _________27th__________ day of __________July_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs de oficio.
It is further ordered that __________xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ recover from __________xx__________ xx__________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. Nos. 174941. February 01, 2012 ](680 Phil. 648)
- G.R. No. 209794, June 27, 2016
- [ G.R. No. 214406. February 06, 2017 ](805 Phil. 244)
- [ G. R. No. L-4602. August 31, 1951 ]
- [ G.R. No. 202687. January 14, 2015 ](750 Phil. 871)
- G.R. No. 184116, June 19, 2013
- [ G.R. No. 116884. March 26, 1998 ](351 Phil. 368)
- [ G.R. No. 109609. May 08, 1996 ](326 Phil. 650)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.