[ G. R. No. 40090. May 08, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40090. May 08, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40090
[ G. R. No. 40090. May 08, 1934 ]
SUSANA VAZQUEZ, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. ENRIQUE MARTIN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Iloilo________, dated the __________31st__________ day of __________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs in this instance against the plaintiff-appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee__________ recover from __________ the appellant___________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 16473. April 20, 1961 ](G.R. No. 16473)
- [ G.R. Nos. 54181-82. October 15, 1985 ](223 Phil. 513; 84 OG No. 22, 3117 (May 30, 1988))
- [ G.R. No. L-17661. December 28, 1961 ]
- [ G.R. No. 181683. October 07, 2015 ](770 Phil. 612)
- [ G.R. No. 175139. April 18, 2012 ](686 Phil. 86)
- [ G.R. No. 118691. April 17, 1997 ](337 Phil. 721)
- G.R. No. 125017, March 12, 2002
- G.R. No. 140365, July 11, 2001
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.