CTA Case No. 1682 (Decision)
tt<.l�UBLlC OF THE PHILIPPINF.D COU RT OF TAX APPE .4L8 QUEZON CITY - - - ,- X lo rs r 1, o an . 1 6 , in r: 0 .. .. .. .. � 't � .., � � 1o. .. � � � .. .., .. "' . .. ��� t � � � ., �� ' ? 1, '1�5 . � �. �������� � 352
I �~ � ... .� 1 .. . . 1 � � � ~ � � �� . � ~ 4 � .. .. � .� .�..�. t ��� �� ��� . . . . . . � � � � � � � � ~ �, �� � � � � 1 . ... . . �� ��� � '� ) t () � . �a
r- 2 i1 1 ol t � ... :. if 1 1 1 354
... 1 �5 3SS
.C:t ;/l ON "" � ?A . ASlll flC� 1 1 n� th 1 12 . ( . s t . 1 \ ! -t . "12 ooo. o f v� t1 1 �� f lt ot e l loy � t t t 6-1, cr 1 :~.8 d Oo pa 1 t c l f an f inol p 1.11 c of '~ I�:.. e pa o er �tr. p 11 ' � �'ill" G � � 1-~ l' w.
) , "' .~ I\ ' � 1'96.. t J> p 19 f2 52..."-�;: , 1 ,,. (_ i' ' 1.. D � toe.) On 19 Q 8 10"" 11 ...) II" 11, � l. l 0 0 ., Til l 1 n.r :1s e r �' 1"' f' �t h !on } th ni �f th~J 0 () t em {) Pit i c � 387
~; c � . . l t If � 0 A 0 "' . ���~ � 1:." � 1 # "" ~r .... f) t o.. -,( ) e. r h� , tax $ Qll WIH X ) cont:c:'! d tlnd i:.l 1m th t d ~ Lt .Jd 'H'l it j C""'' rr -�� �b Vt> h c~U$ t.ta, 1 rev, df!':iCJ .,t�ut � ar;Jct .r . r .u In I'! ~ cr th~ sn ll n l sbl or h~ t~~ ' it 1u 0 f qt f la fjlH"�.iOl"& 'lf'> ' 'i sil,}n . C"*r'"" ~; ... m l c t, ' 1 . ' ,. inc. p rt ti�"'1 II 1s 1""" 398
� I tl � ' r i r 1 ' 389 �
- t le or . �ale ot' t t! c ien 27 ) 360
0 th � b t \c) .1, 5 1 .. ~ . $ 1960 an 1 62 c-.. 111 r w1tb 'h .. ill:> ltl .;(}��/ / .eti .. . ... 381 ''
- 1 362
- 1 363
0~(;1 ..: ...~}~? - (:Jl'., ....~ t;.;,. 168 �lt- i" 4U"""' 11 :~ el!o ~ f"$ ~1 th tT-l('- ��� �E: ~ pt~~s d .1 th .H o.~. : �erct !''/ ot uatie~ ,�r;,., '-S to tho 'il"~~.tr1nr, set');Jf! and �� ften f C;-(.1 ie�n tti or tel 1. toe!� � a~ ~nct- ~d y :; ct1 cr ; f"' r . ~ l.'t~l � � (!t �~~~~ .. ~~ . r . � (C � ~ ,~ acion de la Mission de '\c j. . ...
� J "~ tt ~ h ll re 'h j)f' c c $tile :c u () 1 13, 1' 1 r r . ~oo... .D�J., ,.,;\ t n " Qv \Jh d1 Q 1 c i ( � ' � . ""! ... . .i n...~ t) Cl1C~.~ ,., r dif- t e .(), � af t .. 1 to i ,f 1 rd 0 n tt 11 t � 385
,, )~ t � � ~ 1 � 15, 9 c .,.~~~~ ' .11 � t ....:.. t!l' a .t f!, .- �n .b�� <"!t t . , C. th J.l � Oe�. f:' f't)d 0 th~ t t a~ ai �11- c r .(';�. ~ 'tt.""l ~l 1d balanc~ ., "1 ~ bQ rop �) fa t 366
c "� 0! JlO ..,. o. 1� ..a et~~)R on l oti it1 s e4aUI � rt ()~~�- 0 ; +'-+ , that � rr , $. Y tt, t:..,. f' ~ w~ 0; ' J . '!b� :t 0 .n 't ~ !It 1 e) o! ~ ~a .. -.utili " t l ' , "'tll~r i e nd 11 t1en 1.~ t 1~ 2 l~ ~- "!' � � t of ... l l w 0 ..... .��... . ,.. 367
12 � t, 1 � 1 368
1 t � ~ (1 '0 \Da�::nf:HI.'!' ti !) ~r bv 1 nl , t., 1 ~t ~lJ':f.lO 11 p vt '? e 0 'in r b ryrpr"f' t1Q .1 Qtde.r to $ i n� ch '1 a 16� t! 1 30) r 1 ro. th e hl <h�'<l �$1cn 1 on ... i� 1 1 :a d l qu n t 369
' .. t � ( ' � � 370
More in CTA Decisions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ASIAN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1519)
- CTA Case No. 1468 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1468)
- CTA Case No. 2821 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2821)
- DEUTSCHE KNOWLEDGE SERVICES PTE. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8443)
- ERLINDA ABACAN, doing business Under the Firm name BRISTOL SHOES vs. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8814)
- CITY ASSESSOR OF PARANAQUE CITY v. PORTAL HOLDINGS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 998)
- EPSON PRECISION (PHILIPPINES) INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6184)
- TUTUBAN PROPERTIES. INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6570)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.