CTA Case No. 3518 (Resolution)
ICto'rtJflLI(" Of' 1 r ,:Of-tiL!f'Pti'JPt ~OURf OF TAX A.f'P�AUJ QUEZON 0 "Y l c., 1 l 'II. Pet.t ion r, v - v reua - c ��� c s ~ � 3518 I-> l I L nden � '"s l..UTlO c n 0 th �� ti tr i i n" filed by t tio r o u 1� 1 70 a 9roun th �� a nt f r fie ncy - t X nd 1 hholding tax- re lv h lr d n th 8 bj 0 c r 1� ttl - nt n t p rti. ur u t t x cutiv r r o. 44, wit ti ion r p yi n 0 2 �� 562.00, r pr ti t �� ic X 11 bility u1 y n h. r o , nd 1ng o j c ion n th pr 0 n � n ai 1o 1a h r by y, t th p J. 0 r vi w c .. n i r wi h r n n thi c se d d cl n er te � D. Ci y, ro nil , 7, 19 7. -
More in CTA Resolutions
- LIFEBANK FOUNDATION, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1727)
- NISSAN MOTOR PHILIPPINES. INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7547)
- UPS SCS (PHILIPPINES), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9462)
- CTA Case No. 2504 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2504)
- CTA Case No. 520 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 520)
- CARMEN COPPER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9726)
- LAPANDAY FOODS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10122)
- COSMOS BOTTLING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2081)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.