[ G. R. No. 41810. May 29, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41810. May 29, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41810
[ G. R. No. 41810. May 29, 1934 ]
GRACIANO HAYA, PETITIONER VS. THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF CASIGURAN, SORSOGON, RESPONDENT.
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________29th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the dispositive part of the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Sorsogon________, dated the __________21st__________ day of __________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-four____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, with the costs of this instance against the appellant.
It is further ordered that xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________ recover from xx__________xx__________xx__________xx the sum of Pxx__________xx , as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- A.C. No. 7940, April 24, 2012
- [ G.R. No. L-27732. May 18, 1978 ](172 Phil. 603; 74 OG 5760 (July 24, 1978))
- [ G.R. No. 176909. February 18, 2008 ](569 Phil. 518; 105 OG No. 3, 279 (January 19, 2009))
- [ G.R. No. 93394. December 20, 1990 ](270 Phil. 630)
- G.R. No. 132218, July 24, 2003
- [ G.R. No. 232619. August 29, 2018 ](839 Phil. 408)
- G.R. No. 113103, June 13, 1997
- G.R. No. 166581, December 07, 2015
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.