CTA Case No. 1503 (Decision)
' j t r� I � r � 0 r 0u y ... r r' c t ct a- t c 'eo e c .. 152
' ,Q ... 'l~&~ w. 1, 03 0 � 1 11 d 1 n t � 1c~ tt t (3 ) or b ll 0 u >ft!ll'>!~'l 14 ., t e r � to r i e . ,. ' t t_ 0 ,.1f! l ' � -7'5 ' .1" til'! r, � f h (hJ ! tb~ ~�� � . e~e~t ot I of ! t ror sri .s, lef.l o. ~~ ,, n ry, pt (1 1 an f .. E' ~ in 2, r 1. ( 01 ( 1" . ~~h ? ~ ~I. P.C .. ) . I c 0 .. 1 f'l 3t re l 1 1 h t 112',1te41. lh 1 . t, -o :.. r : 36,3 . � "'; 0 $ "t IS lnc 0 1 ' or 1 1,. ,., 1 c X ' u fr h1 t53
d ct � 1 , 667. 7, 1 1. inc c ,13 ,13 . Cl , it 1 J r o. ) . x of 2 , � 39., h it .c , ut 11 ~ p id o th itt nc aoe l:e ~ h11 p��;in t. 'S lg1 U"::;, r a 1t1ng n ) l.y 1 b r Ql h h bar or 0 ltp n e in tl 0 18 , 0 '1 . 0' inc in t 1 ione f 1c ru �1 r f sg0 � t r n od that ts , I� 15 Ll
u:b 1 � 21 t y, 1t io � r r 0 1 �t 0 - � n- l r 155
Dcw. lScIO_~' -m.. t5'0 ' X ). 1 ,._. Lu ~ ~)
6 � 157
� s- � 1S -' !t n . .'I ft u lie: �t _ � �23 ' 't 10 . ~ t n ot n 1n 1 0 1 r How ~n ~'ie Co ., l :. � � lc ' ane 1 .� c.,, It .. � C 20501, nr1 3~~ 1 S � r oth. d orl~lons (r..eet o s ot . c 1 .(I roll 1 nt COl" t 0 ot 0 \} t1 t ivlt orR ublt t 1n- 1 1outtly e te by h' r � d e .... s ~ 0 gr eo v<al - 1. � l'b 0.11 . t t � 1e 2 ov. � 1 61., f'd .� in -~1 Co . , . ll 158
10 t the C.l l"'at th 'tor- () ( wtl1.c ') or eid onr f.dent r ne ' r � d eo on 0( i 1=<erm t d ct� 1 :lli g.r-o e of necessary expenses p r .c rr .rr 0 l r � (>.c io th t :1 po ts ro o ;~+, o1' Inte.re l �t to b . ot lar � s. to t!lon ion 1n t to 1 fit$$ t ., b f t t..1-t ' i d0 it 0 - (\ t 9 2' lt, 9 ) . -! t is only �R or f93 19? nt f n co .o:rat1on t ( � ' 2 :a i 1 7' 4 +1 ; d ral Ttl- . :� 159
�� � g n G� t (t '17 !� ;, P� !>;). t1 �1 of h"" ., b1 1 tJ(a)( ) t ursuan ot1 n c1 0. 1 .. '
- It 15' 1 t 1"8 t 1 t� t �t � .. ). 3 t � , � �� c .) � .� 1 .1 c� � , t t
� : ~ l � 1?03 11 " v . y 1 1 ;6 . 1d ll r d .i l;r r 195 �� 'l'h fer - th X ' bn or 1net:rr -� . 1 rry :r d (! �tt Jn ' u t1 ne ! r th 1. h t .. l:G . y t (� f.v i fltt c: a t .. ? Up�! , pr 1 i'l, th s ot .. ts i .lea 1 h~ r ht D tl i t .~ l .r 1 nt tc l aw e.... rl nn 'h.... hold ' o. r h :"" "' or or �r., eoro t i j l ,~ 3.1 �� 162
. ,, 1 r c, � f!~y fl--- -I L-w4 ~ ' � � ;, 163
More in CTA Decisions
- EAST WEST BANKING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7035)
- PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5792)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. 8514)
- CTA Case No. 5752 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5752)
- GETZ PHARMA (PHILS.), INC. v. HON.COMMISSIONER KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES, HON. ALFREDO V. MISAJON, Regional Director, Revenue Region No. 7 and HON. JOSEPHINE S. VIRTUCIO, Regional District Officer, Revenue District No. 43-A, East Pasig(CTA Case No. EB 2435)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9435)
- CTA Case No. 3206 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3206)
- CTA Case No. 5171 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5171)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.