CTA Case No. 155 (Decision)
fU I LUI I OP' I 1< IIILIPPI~P.I CUUH.l OF 1 \. ~~&l...::i M.Al\llL4 I~LIG Petit�ion r� �, - versus � c.r.A. � � 15~ C iL T n�t. x- � - - - � - - - � - - � � - � �X Th r espondent aa..ssed agalnst t e tttloner the su� of 182, 34~.00. it ize �� f llo �~ 1. Def!.clency sales tax l . ~~. 175,681. n sales of logs to buyers in .Japan 3~. 13�.2� f June 14, 19~1 to June 19, 19~3, �!th an a~gregate selling price of 2,810,900. ; ----- surcharge ------ 2. eflc1ency sales tax ~ . 330.96 on sales of lwaber to buyer� 1n ManU� 1 . 332�74 __6il(,.j..6._6..,.3�,.,...,7_ and Ce.bu fr� the first quarter of 1951 te tne lat arter of 19~ --�- ~ ~ au.rcharge ------ TOTAL ----- The aaMI nt !a baaed on ;.;,ection 186 o! the - tional Internal venue Code, as a ended y �public Acta os, 588 and ~. ~sing a rcentage tax of on original sales of foreat products, and ect1 n � which t.poses a surcharge of said tax, Contending that t e asaesa nt is co trary to law, petitioner has appealed fro the ee a on of 55
cD.ErC.lAS.I c � � 1~~ - 2- respondent. e shall ftrat t ka up the aaaaa� ent in eon� ne~tlon tth t ht ~hip nt$ of loga to Japan . The tssua is heth�r or not t ales of log' to uyers in Japan w.ra ef! c tad 1n th ~hilipptn s so as to taxable hera , or in Japan an � th refore , non-taxable. fro the stipulation f cts sub itted Uy the putiea a~the nidonce adduced during t he 811ring o the case, t a~p ars thGt th cont:nc s of s 1 era negotiated y pet itioner's a nt in J p1n; that the eon- tracts of aala we~� conf!r ed y ald agent oy ~ ans of purchase notea sent to the aallara and sellar's note to the buyttrSJ th t th logs era shipped either under ter � F. � � 1111 � urigao. or c. I ., isll � ri- IOJ thilt by the ta:r s of the ill of lad n the logs era "~onsigned to the ord r of the s ller (nottfy r es� pe~tive buyers)�, t a all freight eharg s were paid y the yar J th t in ship nta un er t ~ s P.o.a. 1al1g, th logs re insured y th� bu ers; th t in sht ants under tar 1 c. ~ I . oillig. t � logs era insure by the seller, pet itioner hareinJ and that the billa of lain � insuran~e p l"cie t ken n tht n of the seller, and ot rcial n �hipping docu� nts . .re indorsed in blank and p~ en~ed to the b nk 1n antla for collection throu h ho the fore gn buyers opened letter of credit .~ � � rae wit resp ndent that , in the c ircu � stances stated above . title to the logs shlpp d abroad passed fro the teller to the foreign buytrs in the 559 ..
�~c~- � l 5 -- 11 pin � � t �f rc - tic � 1�� 0 v c �� t � � c fc 1 1n ~ eller ot f � is to r ta 1 vll � vi a � � � 1 ly f r yer o ti � instant ease. ave o lp the lo s passe 1n � 11 p ln r 560
� 15 -- eelle:t to t n buyer use fntvht char t� nta re y � bu se cases ere - en by t eller t � re - of t � ta if � � is :re f pin~ oc le letter� o er - � f re t. . . 561 5~4
c1 � 155 c ��� -~ - 1 !>5,' here �t as helds t Aff y the upre Cour in G. � o. L�l 131� r 30. 19~7. . 562
E o. 1~5 - 6- � A p ntl of t on h t lie c o. c 1n h ff ct of cl ory t t c ct only � r 1 tin to ut y1 icle n � r t n ct! n 1 1~ f y$ d li �n ct on 1 6 1c pu c c up ( }t t per c- j t o lB eont n - ct o. 1612. J 1r on . c. 9, th n t n � ft r t n nt o ct on 1 y p ct � 1612. 11 p ro d of t cl n r ct n 1 - 18 of the nu Cod ct r r or pr - cer. rr sp ct of ny pping r n ch y influ nc n th tr ns r o p 0 t- xported, r X :pt fro ta � t is that action f Co
en thel' - 56 1 S~l
- 8 .. � a o taxatt n any nt reeet by a tax� pa r fro the �r nts of t il p 1n � or of the or ! ng th le t 565
.TJ.AS.l CA-SE � 1~~ - .. did n h v the power to tax �th !nstru ntaltt!�� of t v�ry o 1: nt whic:h ught f.t lnt.o xi&t�ne � n1at zu 1 ' lon tr v~ltd after ~ 1nde nd nee. tion ho tax t o 0 t=� t lllpp!.n � 0 priv te in v 1 wit u. ~ tn�tr ental1ty f t nt � I Y8J.' t fl~ �� tion n r expr st prov1si n of la 'Or ra y t- er. t.he two eo " trf. �� .. e ere not a are of any 1 t 1 � � tr s ct! � with t u. S .. �� � y x utive treaty, the .illppina uov r nt 8 a 1 ited tax ex yti ' o th l1 :tted nt nd tt avy tn t h u ap xecutiv A t en . ' ,, ses Agr 566 557
EI I � C.T.A. C NO. 1&5 - 10 - A ~ aory ading of paragraph 4 of rt1cle lV of t � Execut!v gree e t will reveal that the ex- � ptton fro any proc�ssin; or intern 1 tax f the Govern t of the Un ted St tes , or any d part~ nt or gency th r of. ppl to rt cles 1 porte into the h l!pptne and intended for us by such Gove nt . or by ny depart ent or ncy th�r f. r � exe !on do � not p ly t tiel & s 1 in the Philippine t the � � v rn nt for of the s true with r & ct to th exe t on provided in Art cle V of the a&et Agr e� ent. T � t1cle& nicb are authorized to exe t un er s A~ en re those hlch are con ign o, or deetin for, the Unlted S t a uthor t1 f r x- cl &tv n th construct on , ten nc � o r - tion or d f ns of th hr t.e 1 pp!n � d crib� rt cl I . C rt inly, the Ph 1 p in ot nter nto a tr aty agr n conn ction !t th t n of er c n s n fore 9 c untri �� It f lo & t t t t lo n th hil ppin y p t t oner to th u. � r y for th of ~h 1 tt r 1n J n not nt tl d o xompt on fro t t x. T � s c d te cont te y p t1t1 n r 1 t s to the f!ciency ales tax n sales f lu r to .v. � in anila and fro th first qu ~t r o 19 1 to t r of 195 in t � su of ,s .9 , pl � 2 unting o 1, S2.74, or a tot 1 of 6, 663.7 � ;. . 56 7
c �C�IS�! o. 155 - ll - ring the h ring of th c � ~ounsel for r spon� d nt itted th t there �a n error n th co U� t ation 0 the def c ency sal tax an urch r � in c onn ct!on th do. stic les. pond nt , t&t defie ney 1 ' t x . nd - tt d yr n 6. 626. 65, t d of 6.66 . 70. rc; Ev nee p.r sented by t!ti n r to t hat of lo s n r to yers. t off c in 1 9 r ly lo t 0 an. 1 .1" nd sued th eorre pond n pr vi ion 1 inv c ndi~ t ng th r n st t of t pro- s llin c� t in tnt pro 1n 0 c - in h 0 1n l1 .r u d in f lin t r turns f r 1 s t r o � Th 1 ctu lly y th n l ff c f r 1 ed th ctu 1 11 t fin 1 oic s. In t llin pric in c t d tl vi lon 1 vie n XC 5 t ct 1 lling r e f n1 e:. In t � ctu 1 11 - nts c of h in t v It r that t d:l.ff r nc t h 0 1 n 1 v c nd t al lnvo c � r rror f. ric in in sur ~ nts f t lo n !u r. ur nt1r r o fro the 1st qu rter of 1 51 arter of 19~. the exc ~ of the ount ho ., 56 8
� 1~ - 12 - t � provisional inv tees over t � nt1 sho as the actual selling prices a oun ed to 1 6,026.3 , to collec fr peti� tioner the of 6, 626. 6 as f ci cy lea tax aod rcharve. evi ne e & pre aente~ by r 1 ndent to eon� trad!ct the ev nee pr 1 n d by t i t i ner . Upon t evidence of r ec rd, t x le r 1 selling prices of the 1 a n r o t o i la and Cebu yers r� thos in t 1 1nvotc�� n n t t � 0 1n th 1 onal vo ce � Pet � tlon�~ di ot, t fo the eces ary djust t in ts ok n recorda an4 ln ts sale t r turn o a to fl c c r- rect gross sell pric s of lt. l of 1 lu r. It ae rror for r n nt to cons! r h u of 1 part of the 0 111n prices of the logs r sold by p t ion � th ����� nt th f c y le t X n said a nt c ot. � In t 1r """"'"'"... �c for r pon nt v asked. the at o 1 Ccurt to pay t � su f 10,000.00 � � co � u rt of hich they alleg da �(d) at tit n p t f th a dit on 1 �� penalty 1n extrajud c it� viol ti n of sect1 na the Tax Cod � �� nal of the s Code. on t lnt. � 569 55b
DC I � 1:)5 C.T.A. - 13- e have ex tined the reco s of the c d te~ 1ne ether or not there h d en a co o tse val! ly entered tnto bet n t � p ies in r� rd to the suppose vi la .1 n y tf.tio er of the pr i ion of ect!ona 183 a d 186, nallz n .t'o:t tion �� of t � venue Co � h v fou d � In his d - titioner; �xh. c:Laton of epte %' 27, t te p 3, espon nt),. this ia bat re po bo 1 you desire to extraju tcial y aettlt th anal 11 1l tie 1 ing ro your afore aid violat on � you ay pay t e penaltr of 1 � � � failure to p y the sa es tax &i x x x . � e do not ere fin nt n re- oartl to th of 10, ich is ap 1 1 to tbla Court. Th t port! l�tt r of re a ove, as ffer o.r a ug $t1on mad to tltl n r o c r ise the latter'� all d n 1 li bilitt � II It o a not . f all under t � c ~ gory of a cision of respo d rt within the an!ng of ct!on 7 of publ c o. 1125 11hlch y appe to th1 Court. { Ang 1 araos v. au of lnt n 1 evenue , � � � � 229, arch ~ . 19~6J U iverslty of t v. ol' c o -� ~onal ration, epte ber 1 , 1956.) h r fo titionv was rt t n not lu in t .. is at �.r in t appeal �� it canno by offer co which 1a not accept � to it . 570 sss
c0 .�r\,.A!S.I - 14 - F , th dec1�1on nd petit tone �ppealed r ia r� y h re y o.r erad to pay t of 17 , 1.30, repre- tentitl 1c1 ncy &ales ax n surcharg n ehip- nts of 1 gs o yer Jep n er ter ��� une and c. I 1 11 , cover!n t 1~01 to Jun� 19 , ~3. Th nn <1 tt1e ��l � 1 n to 6. 626. 6 11 et aa �� 1th c:oe tit ()l �� nil , 571 u ��~ ss4
More in CTA Decisions
- CARMEN COPPER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2018)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. FILAIRCO, INC., doing business under the name and style TRANE PHILIPINES(CTA Case No. EB 2793)
- FILMINERA RESOURCES CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8610)
- MYSERV INTERNATIONAL INC. as represented by Ms. CECILIA O. TOLEDO v. CESAR R. DULAY, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, AND DEOGRACIAS T. VILLAR, JR., REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF REVENUE DISTRICT OFFICE 43-B(CTA Case No. 10796)
- CLARK WATER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8648)
- SURFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. HON CITY TREASURER & HON. CITY ASSESSOR, MANDALUYONG CITY.(CTA Case No. AC-5)
- SEMIRARA MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7717)
- GOLDMINE RICE MARKETING, represented by its Proprietor MR. ORLANDO C. MANUNTAG v. HON. DISTRICT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, Port of Manila International Container Terminal (MICT) S Access Road, North Harbor, Port Area, Tondo, Manila and HON. REY LEONARDO GUERRERO, Commissioner of Customs, G/F OCOM Bldg. 16th St., South Harbor, Port Area, Manila(CTA Case No. EB 2617)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.