[ G. R. No. 39397. July 31, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39397. July 31, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39397
[ G. R. No. 39397. July 31, 1934 ]
CATILANO GUIADO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. SALUSTIANO CULAO ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________5th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pampanga________, dated the __________2nd__________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, without special pronouncement as to the costs.
It is further ordered that __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ from the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 253342. June 22, 2022 ](923 Phil. 750)
- [ A.C. No. 10252. December 11, 2019 ](867 Phil. 910)
- [ G.R. No. 108205. February 15, 2000 ](382 Phil. 352)
- [ G.R. No. 22678. January 12, 1925 ](G.R. No. 22678)
- [ G.R. NO. 60161. March 21, 1990 ](262 Phil. 430)
- G.R. No. 240495, September 15, 2021
- [ G.R. No. 193943. January 16, 2012 ](679 Phil. 115)
- [ G.R. No. 259284. January 24, 2024 ](950 Phil. 293)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.