CTA Case No. 1027 (Decision)
:uo: I" UflUC OJ' THE PBILIPPlN t r COURT OF TA.K &P,PE:AL8 QUEZON G'Jl:r �.. ftl) -,4 . ~t I . {filf ' C C irS �� � � - � � ... X c ". . S. a , 1 '$ r 14 15 1 ~n 5n 11 n r ... ?,2'26. 94�, � i. t h~1 / I , r t c C� . t .i ' .._.....T'l~ 0 J: . 375
, ~ctl � lo uat� Y� 1. i a 0 tor td ry 1ono,r��� l::rJ . J..o o Jell 31, Vol "' ' 195'9, � 1.. 19;:~; t rt~ ~ re ond nt�a 1,. ts, th latt t' toun4 t(utt pet.i ";io"er uam:tf t:�� 4 sine A gu t " t a r . ul ' 37 6
' 1 -' � le ( � �' of 1 �s( ' 377
� � t ' , ; � ' 'c .. . � 0 378
., 1 S1 \ � tl � Th 1 shou d :,no't' 379
II i' tt .1 � ... 380
� 3 7 throu t f!Y of e tL m .('.� ine n b te t . .in , ~- 1 c .t o dy .. n tl:j a n , d tlnctly cl~~ ifyin ch p _!' t . ite � i. 9 �ocn U . . r. 5. e t .i o , r :r~ ct .&.0 tL , nufactu~ of cr. ell t~ ~dan ru yarn on y . ~ ::: m~n if t~ti .at ,n th nt t .h 0"1". t c � f 0 of ""n' t �E;\ ne ' .r 0 :a �t �~ in t ( ~o lt o.. .I. nu._.,, .. on :r it:: ~ 1 bE; .. dt;, the )O�nt . d n <d fait ! 0!' q~ .... ; tl 1 ia '"o t �C t~x t .t.o o .,__ "~"n, en hi!' not mj.s 1 "i t , ''hi t � nc.t: c . it: ed thi c ' �) . \. ' .\ -~ I I� I I
� t � .�l}" . ti 1 t �
'�\ 1 0 17 t lt ). ".. � ' t <f.{ , il 0� 11 o, if 1 s( r" or 19 � 1 '6 383
More in CTA Decisions
- TEEKAY SHIPPING PHILIPPINES INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7533)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-84 (Decision)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-84)
- CTA Case No. 1139 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1139)
- METROPOLITAN BANK and TRUST COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6504)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ZILOG ELECTRONICS PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2762)
- CTA Case No. 981 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 981)
- CTA Case No. 2054 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2054)
- CTA Case No. 4639 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4639)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.