CTA Case No. 1383 (Decision)
� c. . �1 ... ... - .... � 1 - ' 0 ' p� 1o ' ' !' 3'1 ...
�1 I .' 1 0 �( p1 r) ' ' t f ." � �� ( ' � t .. 31
� .... .". '' ~ #. -- t r '�� i � .. .l. , f f I J' �- �""'0 ..f' ). .c 1 0 3 1 I I
l '!I -"" t ' 'c. ... � ot. ( i ~ - Ot l 0 I � {i ' J� ._, ~
.. . ( u i. � ' l , :. ~ ��� :;! 01 .. f.. n '�~ �' . ...:J. t t ~~ '� n :" . 11 A. ' . ..'I I r- n - \T 11" J. I ..J.�. p 1 .. J ,., . r ) I '- ... . .. 1 (1 -: . . c 1. . t. c . I � ��~ t. .. � t 't l. r ' 1 i 321 �
o. 10 6 ion ' O�to . 1 ' to ~~,. o-r 1 ;;I u l 0 tr~ r (' . < � .. 3, � �� �I\ ' c ,, . o. J <?r� f' ( - 0 ;1 0 0 ~ t -�l b t' , ' ' "()!} ' . r. ) 0 0 ... .. ,,, !' �� .. "' . o' o c. ' :r c. , Jr n of "~ for r fl !J 0 �(, "' � � 0 *' 1, � 1 t 0 t t i) I ; u:r t "'J.. o.f, A '..\. �t � ' , !l t~ l l t 1 .. �EJr t lo.� ... w ( c t-t t.i.o t ' n .cir lt .... n 0 f h "" l. 0 0 32
1 � 1 3' 7 h 1 in r 7, .) n 0 cr 0 01 � c. � 0 - - 0 d � 1 .n o n t 323
-. r, 0 11 '� l � :\,,. h 0 l. ,.. t ~.. j � ( in 1bl t r t :1 es oc � f t r t 0 jt ,Q ,. 324
32
l- �1 1 r � r, " 1 '57 , t 0 r r . '} r 0 3. 75, 8 10 75. nn i n 0 � � � t or r r co c ion 1 - 32
- n. 1 1 e' '' .-:1 c1 r t r t ' th/ t 0 i t ~ Ol! ~ l'l ... 1 p h r1 � ~0 1n tt c iz d loy u 11 � 'h fr r 0 ' n� 1 c� . c. n 7� r pl � 1. r- t . �n. ) . b1 � � � 17-1 t 1 0 h. 0 i 0 di b1 n '0 1- C1 t 0 pu .. 4, c, ct rn o. � r 0 ' � .Jnio ' 11. t 3 v l . t r ' 0 1 32 7
D c ' �1 3 12 .r: 1 .~ � 2";;'. 5' i l1 ., � � 1 1) . I c� � 328
�1 1 0 � 0 �( 11 ')' , l" � � � 37 � 7 -17 t ). I 1e ld 1 It 0 d �'J 0 t 0 ' � t 1 1 57, 195 ) tc )y 51 ) � � t t 19 � ~'
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 6290 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6290)
- CTA Case No. 893 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 893)
- PHILIPPINE GEOTHERMAL PRODUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1894)
- MEGACONSTRUCT GROUP, INC. v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9992)
- CTA Case No. 432 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 432)
- VESTINA SECURITY SERVICES INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10889)
- CHEMFIELDS, INC v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6691)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. (PAL) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS. (Consolidated with CTA Case No.8075)(CTA Case No. 8032)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.