CTA Case No. 118 (Resolution)
PHIL PT .._ APPEALS lLA � ... i� � - .... - ..... - -.. - .... 1 y GO .. c �� � - � 78 - tJ/!IP�.
- LU I .� � .. � l l ., - , ... 1i ,i ) 3 .. on r� #' 0 h r ord is u d � y th 0 or bl s h � ~0 r r i t r t i g ti p~-evio r to th ..;p cial Adr ini r tor 0 y th 1 � of ~nt nal ' on t s�id a1 � n ly l ~�2 � nora.ol u 0tl � p stol 0 h l \,t urt i u e... di� .., i a n a t:t ol . io on h for a pro par i 1 xt -j <.b. cial iti n 01 tt. st t l l�eida -in until \Oh s t d i- t.a o. a p id n to s 10 l ! t- r~ al v riU . ~ode vi t. t ur j d $1 11 a t.hor zeo �he �J;xecuc.or 0" ju i l l ad..1.nis r to uel'v r ist:cl� tl r t 'I a 't -'n d n t. � 1 1> i(. h l p� � 19~1 of pt. � ,� � -h t 9 . l 6 ,. y 1 � nd July l 1 52 o': ti'l& Co t w re i ,ue ru ....:o. l i .. 6. fhe J.O vi V; ... h i ality oi t~1 :r. .rc Ol! h l: u .t 0 sd i () ir orders,. c c I..A)V rn� th es 0t ;..io i~ 79
�1 , -- f s r of F* st n ta of Il c i i c No. 36 s r f ich t said 1 an ul um o r d t Ap il 22. 1955 r � quirin t Hl ad 1inis r .o:r o p to t e v ~rn..tent i ays pt ~ -i. 0 I' nd i 1 J:it nc tax~ in qu tio 7. t t , Jini r to of th t t of th c d� f 0t s t t� ith t e s nti n d or of onorao J . lo .o . ci ;)' a, Tha Antonio Dir cto, ho cl ai 0 be the r inist r f t 0 1 e lc is qu tioni 1i t' � " f�~.r 1 i f.Ll d 0 A l.l � 1955 t v ry same nt of th r pond nt ...".. ne v n ., lx dy cid in f vor t � � y vi t of d Co f ir nst c I loco "'ur�J Tha t h ;.~,., tit �on rhr l " acr.i. e for hi rt t , . n cl ft mnent for id t t c axtts a.ain t t t f th as 1 ci n � for rt of � r t Inst nc � 11 c & n h th c a '1 ci a 0 nt e n .I i1 c r'd:ty 1 to ali v ry t�' i n ,. ti'l 1�T t. t 0 n it. on t1 \.,;() 11 c r, t 9 () p <> t 80 � ..
� . � 11 , -4 - rt of th other parti . th e1 im f the ov n- nt, t. !.,OUrt o "ir �tanc o llocos ur issu$d in p � ragrapl d5 of ~th s r lution ~hich a~ h tofor t t d have no'~ m~;; final n ~ e:x .eutory~ 11. I v n on groun of ity and fair play. t alone th fact that th afor id ord-re of the rt of First lnstane of J.lo... os 3ur r quiring the J.nistrato:r of the estat of th dgcoased .. 1 cicla I na to pay to th Gov :rnrnon � th state and inho.x:i� nc ta.xel;) dEk. an d ave neco~� e fin l an x cutory ~h .r f r � b yond th juris iction of th .,. ur of T X �1pp ls tO I:' view _, dify or r vers under suc�tions 7 1 and 22 \.tl I public Act r~o. 1125 . it do s not '1. o: .it l l on tl lip$ th petition r h ra.:.n . At't~..oni ccto . to qu �tion f r t is !,.;OUrt th very sa!rle he a .itt d fo the heirs o laci a Mina be ore the COurt of l at nee of Ilocos ~ur to e valid an le~ l in er:y x sp ct th .ceby 1 adittg no 1 ss t o f ' r Judg s o ,. &ald ..;ourt o issue s� cce si el . th ox- �rs �for �t y.. nt o � til - sses n nt in q-...1estion� &nd ' l~ . fhat for t. prori4'1t coll ctio f \ the taxes t~ ~ q\Je t1on �hie a. on~ \ jud,1.cattid ! y the Cou � of ..:irst Instance of lloco.., ""u 1 in f vol" the "� v rn.:n~o:nt oy vir u � of a final jude ;~ pond~nt "oll c or oi I t r al tyvanu � 1.hxu ~ouns l _. \ � uld {a) press f t\'.\ iat~ exe.ut.:.on o I' , \ 1t 1Z'f /\ !I ~ 81 ' I
1 � ., . .... �f p 11 22~ f nr Ju o� c a in c �. i l 68 (v. . I . � lloc s s r) equiring .e d!j l. 1 r of th t f el it in � 1 cida �. J.n o pa ... ipt of tl' an .b pr cu to th cont c i s !nit� � y t t is l to.r f r ot c mplying ~i h . ntion o t:'d r � . in v of . e 0 � in n i. i s fil y co mr. l . OZ' pond t 11-f un ri orious ci t ry � t y. t il y 0 Ar l{ i y 0 1c 0 t t e l i n r. s, u 82
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 4037 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 4037)
- BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ANTONIO VALERIANO M. BERNARDO, (A.V.M. BERNARDO ENGINEERING) (AT LARGE: Address: No. 604 T. Santiago St., Lingunan, Valenzuela City, Metro Manila)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-109)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE VS. FILPRIDE RESOURCES INCORPORATED(CTA Case No. EB 1134)
- CTA Case No. 1004 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1004)
- IMAGINET INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2374)
- CTA Case No. 6664 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 6664)
- CTA Case No. 3219 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3219)
- CTA Case No. 597 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 597)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.