CTA Case No. 309 (Decision)
nEPUULIC OP' TilE PlllLlPPINEI f:OUHT OF TAX APPEALS MANILA etitione.r, - veraut - c. T.A. c i � 309 eapondent. ~~~~ ~ x� - � � � � - � - � � - �x , cr o Th1 is an appeal fro a decision of respond nt , da � u ust 6, 19 , ��� asing and de andin fr pet tion r p nt of th u of 6,7 2.7 r pre ent- n x on ~ e ato lu n dd1� t1onal au of iae en lty or 1- leg viol tl n f ct on 12 , in relation to ectlon 146, penalized under eet!on 17 , all o the ational n ernal evenue Code. h foll lng facts have etn eata 11sh in th!a cas � et t oner, hll!ppine nufactur n o - pany ( for rev!ty), a corporation uly or anized under Ph111pptne laws , 11 enga e 1n the nufactur an sale of soap, lard an other � 11 ro eta. ro ay 19, 19~1 to D c , 1 or r fro the ith ound .y e a ratories ( th - rat r ��� for ort), of n Juan, lzal, thirty- two thousand six hundr ninety three ( 2. 3) 1 1 meters of c ne ato ap 1c f!l �� t of t i& nttty, it .1:ej ct one thousand v n hun n venty- ,, 637
. t . A. ' � 309 � 2- tera. ce, f r t at e � pert � petitioner aet ally ace pted, retaine a paid for nly t irt t e n ed an t nty ( ) lineal �r� aru! atlll are 1n � throu bout t il fre o � letter, pet! 1 r 11 P� c. � a res ns 111ty o � payuaen f the apec1fi a � � ��1cl , 9 lin uly 2 , rr �~�tv ratorles ece r � 1 � rec.). bile ot r peclfic ax h r lia lltty t t ad, e y su ject to afor...nt1 e � cir� c stances ci d prll 14, 19~6 tt r on�� flliaa� . tt 1 !t r� like t f s reel, recelv r it torte � lt has ��~.-~ li illty f r .-ciflc tax, if y ally � � n the aald 12,~25 lineal � ters of f ilaa � vu, petitl � contends tha t cineaat apbic fil in q~aeatl are ex t fro � 63
� -- � ay nt f p c fie x. ontequently, lt oug t fl l!D$ in n w re pr ce y the is ued n nd for y t fr t t!oner f t � su of 6, 782. 7 as X0 ftl $ ~uest ton , co uted t the r � of . 15 r 1 n 1 tar i as follo. a ln t .. v u , r P n nt f :ro d iol ct n 124, in � tio n 1 6, r c io 17 � 11 X od � � p. 56, e.) r t& nt, p t p 1d 0 t o rt 0 u t 2 � 1956. � e n t nt pe 1 inly nc r t stlon, c t� tio tt c tograpl c 1 in cat io 1 f l or visual ucatlon� , e X t r o � apec1fk t ax r u ov i �� 146 of th r x c To ttr s t �o � d nc , petltlone e lng present d r� conslatin of t he 1�� ta 1 c tlatng � ' .. nj 1 as ocu- l ations � 1 ef so, �gez, 1\1."1 ant 639
� 3tlj nary e~1d nt , c n 1� 1, f lett~rs of un1c pal quoet in �nd/. r t nk1ng p 1t o r for fr s s 1n their vp cttv co un1t1ea , no $tveral .. o 1� of f ll �� p-tck t r nd a f o tl e ne .atogr p c fllills 1n que t on , e tition r r jcctod on a lllpruv! 5 d tJC � n b �o the ,.ourt. tt rc s no dispute that t rest of he films of 'tM lte ~fore tir larly. th~ the at!eel corr ctn sr. f �� t tti u ctur�, � haaiz d th t p~titio . .- 1t shoul � H a.f ility { 1. .., ,.. legally ' ... f pu~h &eel fr Dc ~� 0� on th 12. 525 lin l ec � r 3 , l 55 0 ., �!y f'!l l an t.t. � t ol o in . { ) '�� clna to ph c 1 tion ax bje t 0 �.,ecif�c t x und r 5\ ) .' anci if th uum !sa � ~tf.v h n titioner ybec el � to y the co pro 1se n� al y of -foze p "' ! ua u lven above. �h 11 ft t d15po ft ��- ln r 640
� - ~- lia U!ty f~ spec lc t o on tha 1 , 773 lineal tet of f1 a, lc t e latter ordeHd but Hjecteci ancl re urn to th lth labOr atories. cording to the Tax � a nt of ~~peclf!c tax on d stic products on lc IUCh tax a posed &hal l , � ~t as ot ~1�� ��peclal ly allo � paid edlat ely befoce the pl � of y �the ufactver , p ciucw, CMDH 0 pv bav!D po�����f.OR of the � . ( ect on 124, 1 nal Int ernal � :mer,ufac urer , produce , owner o perton havln n posHa�l n of the 1 , 773 11neu ten of f ll.aa, wh c it return t a rat~t�� � sbould not,thtrefore.be ld ila le f r a t of apeclfic tax t � :IIIIOll"'eaftZ', con� d.er!D t e fact that t tloner �� lla Ulty f~ the p� t of apectflc tax, lf le ally � � on the c.tneuto ._,hie fil � rder �n cc t f y 1 , 1951 to luly 28. 1956. we lncl 1t nnece�aar to te lne ether t :lt f.a the ufiiCtliHr, p.roctucu-, ~ r puson avin po����� on of aatd f!l:U to re lv. th flret in eatlon. The conuover�y .bet1teM � art!�� on hla .core � n the proper \PPl catton f tbe 1 w 1nvolwei. ectlon 146 of the at1onal Internal �- venue ~ttnent portion� of cb h� nder, pr vl.cleaa 641 a
C ION � �T� � ' � 309 - 6- T � above-quoted prov1� of ,law is eletr. It aojects to a.,.cifi~ tax cine to aph1c f a . t eapressly a � elflcally � ta tberefro �� catlonal f!l.Jis or cine to ap lc 11 use<l for vl.ual catlon�. Con..quently. only f! s 1Ch are rt.arlly ducat1onal tn nature or ich ve n p nufactured pr11aclpally for visual cation y be ex te fr 1~1 1c tax. The clarity he phraseolo d er s y t leg! lature 1ta enact the eace t ax- ex t g clause of -..ectl 146 of t r x & t .l'eftder unwuranted any conr.tructi n o sa 1 �� that goet yond the lan age t &t � tute. ver. .. e aware of duty of the courts to ��are fo~ aeeertaln th tru anin of � � actmtnts gr t!ng tax ex tiona. not J.n � a tence of lgulty 11\ the lan ua e of t ax ex- t tng statute ( ��� ~~ � .Jur. ~31� rder to obviate the poaaib111ty of !staking r� leg1alat1 � anlng of t � excepting 1n clau��� tn tbe event the � 11 not � t cle an ua � th reof. t aotec.Oent� of t � fore� quot d ection 146� a foun ~ 4( 642
� - 7- hat t e cle r 1 ngu g of the tatut co. ports 1th 't � legislative nte t. nua, scov � th t r or to t e end! ont - was no d st t of the x Code, t0 � 1 r cine to aph c � used 11 cat � �� otherwise. It - only ne 16, 1949, epu 1 e t o. 295 in Met 146 0 eC ffec , that �..e<tucatlo 1 fll�� � fr � uae for ax� h vl.ual � e ich too nt tlve or fr � 1 9 (now kn f y .. � e i- ratio lie c � ). 0 �� �an X X X X IE �� � n. � elo ?�� � � ill tl y! 1 643 'J./t
- 8- � pea er Prot� orea The entle en y y el if he s desires. � agu1r1 ana th pleasure. � elo a ben is a 11 consi ered edu� cat nal and when � it not educational? � bey are so properly urked� will ur tllell? � Pa lrlgana be nufacturer of educa- tional t11Jas� � . eloaoa oes not the ntl n thln at f approve this 111, every fila anufacturer or f!l producer wlll k hls f1 �� educatlon�l so as to ta e advanta9e of the eftt of this la tax exemption? � agub:l ana They are intencMd or visual cat ton." ( on ��� onal ecord, us� of epre..ntatlvea, lst ongress, h:lrci ���ton, ol. III , � 71 , if!wrsday, ay 20, 19-48, ages 269 2696) . (Un� deracorlng supplied.) r t a ve� ote reco o e proceed!.n � � 1t s eYldent t at ongress ld ot enc1 o exe t fr specific tax just a y f1 dMII8CI :Wit l� cta.ntal tional value. fo a fr specific t x, lt ls not en u e� e possess ._. c�tl al val e. requisite fozo e tl ia that t f a ))een prock.tc:ec:l o ufact\ae principally fo ational purpose, at ls, te ed for visual atruc 1o or ducat1on. t � tpOnMr of be .u jeot en nt , ongr� a lr! an bas said, epu lie t � 295, seeks to ex t f~oa t � pa nt of ~!fie tax t4ycttlontl fllu fgr ytwal tclycttltHh ancl that a ftl is c~ si&vecl educational when t � same 1� .. .tnt�nded. for 641
� 309 YiiYtJ � tSucl~loq. fhus , we f!nd t t the Congres- sional recorda relative to the passage of the end- t confina our view that only cln tlc fU s bleb are pr lly educat ional or intended for vlsual education y receive the 1 ��lAgs of ex- tlOCl beatowed by MCtlo 146 of the ax ~ . as acted. Conversely, therefore , c tog.raphlc fllas whk.b ue pr!llclly nufectu-ecl or pr ced for ~tertain.ent or for tialn9, although th�y !den al ly posaess ao.. 1nfo tlve or educational value, y �not be considered as "educatlooal fllru� falling within the view of t e eJCMpt!on. conte plated y sectio 146 of our evenue c � � e or � le tM e.rilnu:y fll.lla tllh.lc are dally ,socMn t t aters or plecea of .c par- ticulu fl as a ral lesson oz- ssage to convey, and in that senae lt a loci ntal educatio al v lue. Wlarly, 1\eWU.els and travel es exhibited wlth ordinary fllaa ve incidefttal e cational value or one �� e n r i c h i n g k ountl wlth lnfo~tl.ona events, pl.cea and thlnga the.nfA cMplct.O. ""'� t e OZ"d!nuy fU.a, newsreels an travel uea ue pr � Cluced P1"Uully fOJ> .atuta nt. aga!n, � the caae of fllu ~1Mrlly ~e for advertlaln which nowedaya ~ popularly an appropriately n � rciala� . They have info ative or edu- cattonal value for the reason that t y urniah � fer8atl ~� ardtng the allty and uti lty he product or procMtcts ad8.1't1Md.. t such for lv
i � 309 -1 � or catlonal value is eol!ps d y the cardinal ooject1ve hind the prOduction of ~ ~ctal fi � � n!Ch Objective 1� o advertise and theze~y nerate ~ desire for the product or pz eta advertised. �All these films cannot properly~ clasa1f1ed �� �'.-..w;.;ational fi s or cin tograp 1c f1 a uae f� vtsual education within tb pale of t . �� - tlo allow.d y section 146 of the Xax Code. to hold such f1 a eumpt fNm ..,_,_.._ tax, ld render nu � � tory and Man1n leas t ialative 1ntent1 to l1a1t ant of �� nly t particu r claaa a ic 1a tnten ecl for v1aua education. o cona1 ational" � nd aa tu<:h exe t fro ~lflc tax, any fi ich 1aparta for - tlon. a t no rocluced prila ily f 1 purpo�� or f.nt de for visual education, t alnly fR entut i.naent or advartt~..~.~t , uld nduly ex� pan t � field of ~ tatutory exe dart�� 1 1ted nd here y r ndu all f s x t fr ch tax. or it la ell�n!gh !llpoaatble to conceive of any cf.n ma- tographle fil lch 1� co letely devoid of !nfor � t!v or edUc tional v lue.~ � believe nd so hold tbat only ~in �to phi~ films hich are produced , or aanufactured an inten purely for vlsual in� atructlo o~ educatlon shOuld re p the eneftt of ex-.pt1on anted by aect1 t ax o e.J It is � well aattled rule that � � who cla ex tion, at aatlafactorUy Justify hls cla y 646
DEC �r�� E � - 1.1 - th cl r s nt of or n c statut 1 (Col- . l�cto � nil Jo~ � - 75 � c:h 2 - '}). 11 0 t t h or r at f ctor j 11 cla to t 1 ex� 1 vidtd !or y l ( ct 1 of t � Ta Cod , n d). yt i or X t ion, � � u_r of h ll n d � f 0 � s L'l cl t with of 0 f -� ore a n. of co , 11 1 ct. viti e such p cnlc f r u tly produced uc: ln associ te ppy ln in6 tt �t ~t of tit n :r. t ls nc: ur � to e 0 I'V tio s. hicl ere el v rt c - r or .. � vancedthan h s st t of irectl 1 0 t t evolv lr1t0 an � rt s s ~ ssan �ly th 647
- 12 - 1nfor atf n r gard!n t existe~e , qu l ity and , utility of ro u't� tn.u t e d1a of ill oards, n � - pa r , adios, t 1 v1&1on& an �� as. o evez , of the ~ � 1ou& meal , the u of ine t.� c: rently expl it to the fulle t xtent to ere te a f ~ such ro uc � ng t at &t nu r o c nsu r � Thus, th un~.ary public i ub- jec: ed to bl h� pressu.r� s les t 1 ile t i .s th <;O t g;r phi f nt \l ez- the u ts ~ !the � nterta in i l 1. �f at t tion p 0 uc p rily o dver 1 e t1 io er�s ~ 4u s , ci�� � . in 't � vi. tn udi nc a d products. T � tnf r at on 1 or uc he.c-e s ny, of t e ubjK t f i & & rdi .a o tl � whie i ~o v t se ll " ucts f t.ttion r. exhibits t xhibits to l.} , ch are portealy le ters ic:f.p yor v r!ous he dt f �iffer nt c vic or n % tions r eatin nd/or in p i t ~ er for r � s Q ~ � :ln tb ir re p t � co 1 n t 1 t I: tli court's ings that the sunj ct file ar not rinc p 4ly for educatlot.al purposa. 0 r lfi sa � .h s c 1n 0 t lY :U.<lic ary f t eont ntlo Ol:ld filmz tio 1. -y, conu .. $ �Y.hlb :ts 1 a .. + .h. ob erv t o. that ~ the fre� exhibition of the f!~s st!on wa .:�- 648
�t �� � 309 � lS � e&ted a tit oner w s then ad for t � nt~tatn nt der! fro the f ��� tn c as the t e lne atographle 1.. f sin eat oa co ced ly follow t in otlf or pattern of those exit b t b fore the ourt, we are of t e pini , that he ci. to� aphlc ilms ord r accep d ri ay l � 1951 to July , 19 1 f or cln �t uf e� tl n hfc njoy t exe. pt Y ec� tion 146 of 1 x o , ~� th e l pa speeif c t et t oner , ~inl) � lu ia !llty for JIY, nt of the , ho 1 , t fore , p y th if c t x coll~t � In Yl.. our arl f t oner ld lc ax t 1,773 lin r texa of f t rej t r tur e to th lth La r t r ��� r f 1ng n hl cot ccozd!n ly o i le , an th p t ti n r to pay o ly t eu f 6, 1 . 75 r ter& of cin ato raphic fil � c s all ow proc t c i tl .., lsa � atedly to et ~ r .1ot t pe tt y t p y :th c pro e penalty. hav& � � t a co pro iae e a nti lly cont a~ t. t fo that. as h 649
� - 16 - a d untfol' ly hel , this Court � � th ut jurlsdf.e� t!on to c �- yer topytec ro lse pen� � oll c or of �1 Y� p � 14, 19 ~; ven � � .r�� o. �� - 1 lso hol Land r a s rtat �~nal ven e, c.t � � 261, ep � .,7 ~���� cited 1n 11 � oll c t nal �� � 1 7. ) �t - 1 f po ti� tion .r 1 � � y0 pee1 1~ fl. a it or � " pte yl � ly � � c in~ p t t � lla, Phil!pptn , r , l 7. 650
More in CTA Decisions
- HONDA CARS MAKATI, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8806)
- CTA Case No. 6439 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6439)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. WRIGLEY PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 598)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CITIPARKING MANAGEMENT CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2626)
- SEAOIL PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10392)
- CTA Case No. 6696 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6696)
- NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION v. MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF NAVOTAS(CTA Case No. AC-37)
- CTA Case No. 5416 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5416)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.