THE HONG KONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LIMITED-PHILIPPINE BRANCH v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY THE HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LIMITED- PHILIPPINE BRANCHES, Petitioner, - versus - C.T.A. CASE NO. 6525 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL Promulgated: REVENUE, Respondent. FEB 17 2004~~~ x---------------------------------------------- RESOLUTION Confirming the order of this court on February 6, 2004, petitioner's "Motion to Withdraw Petition for Review" filed on December 12, 2003, is hereby GRANTED upon manifestation of petitioner' s counsel that respondent has accepted the Memorandum of Agreement on the Gross Receipts Taxes on Items of Gross Income Subject to Final Withholding Tax, dated November 28, 2003. Accordingly, the petition for review is hereby WITHDRAWN and this case is considered CLOSED AND TERMINATED. SO ORDERED. ~ l.S2 � Ct-v- ERNESTO D. ACOSTA Presiding Judge Associate Judge ~iT1> g_�6\~n~ m. Associate Judge
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 1970 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1970)
- LAZADA E-SERVICES PHILIPPINES, INC. v. CITY OF MAKATI, CITY TREASURER OF MAKATI(CTA Case No. AC-261)
- SPAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9060)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CLARK WATER CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2218)
- COLAS RAIL PHILIPPINES, INC. represented by JEANETTE TUHAO v. ANTONIO L. ILAGAN, in his official capacity as OIC-Regional Director, Revenue Region No. 8A - Makati City, Bureau of Internal Revenue(CTA Case No. 12414)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. U-NID-ME MANPOWER, INCORPORATED and its responsible corporate officers ELAINE T. SUNGA (President) and RICARDO L. BENITEZ (Treasurer), (Room 216 Intramuros Corporate Plaza, Recoletos Street, Intramuros, Manila)(At-Large)(CTA Case No. O-1012)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. BONIFACIO CUSTODIO DEL ROSARIO(CTA Case No. O-717)
- MAIBARARA GEOTHERMAL, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with 8937, 8999 & 9042)(CTA Case No. 8871)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.