[ G. R. No. 38315. August 30, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38315. August 30, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38315
[ G. R. No. 38315. August 30, 1934 ]
THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS, PETITIONER, VS. IDA ABARCA ET AL., CLAIMANTS, JUAN AGUJAR, CLAIMANT AND APPELLANT, BALTAZAR PEÑAFLOR ET AL.,CLAIMANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________14th________day of ________August________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Leyte________, dated the __________24th__________ day of __________June_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- A.M. No. P-16-3586 (Formerly A.M. No. 14-4-43-MCTC), June 05, 2018
- [ G.R. No. 127500. June 08, 2000 ](388 Phil. 993)
- [ G.R. No. L-40858. September 15, 1987 ](238 Phil. 17)
- [ G.R. No. 202578. September 27, 2017 ](818 Phil. 912)
- [ G.R. No. L-6705. December 23, 1954 ]
- [ G.R. No. 94090. October 18, 1990 ](268 Phil. 877)
- A.M. No. P-25-246 (Formerly JIB FPI No. 23-276-P), July 29, 2025
- G.R. No. 115191, December 21, 1999
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.