CTA Case No. 1882 (Resolution)
REPUBLIC OF THE-PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CIT'Y
..005C8 350A185 Ine.. Petitioner,
versus - .T..0.1882
REVEIUE, COIDSIOEROK INSEANAL noapondent.
REMOEXTION
Considerie.stitionsr's aoticn to dtasiss
tne norein petition for revisw on tho zroune tha
it aeo avcilod itnelf of tne tax omnaaty nner
Freaidential DcoreWo.60, datsa evuber 24, i97
by payin 9,303.53 in full nonpiote tl6sont
os the dericlenoy pureentnge tax hersin invoivea
as eviunecc uy she xrrox copy of Officisl Reeaipt
R0. E 6930+98,and eriacx or onjeetion on the
psrt c responseng coonsel, the ia otion is
hereby oasg
0
quezun city, Maren al, i973.
R(mNn Fresidin KA Jweo
1t HAROS L AVACENA Asaocinte Judge Asnocinte Ju
More in CTA Resolutions
- BRIGHT ALLIANCE ENTERPRISES CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9696)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. ABELARDO C. ESPIRITU and ARMAND C. ESPIRITU(CTA Case No. O-152)
- AECOM PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1959)
- CTA Case No. 1215 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1215)
- CTA Case No. 684 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 684)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. ZIEGFRIED LOO TIAN (No. 1013, Juan Luna Street, Brgy. 7, Zone 1, Tondo Manila)(CTA Case No. O-939)
- NUEVA ECIJA II ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. -Area 2 v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2319)
- CTA Case No. 2304 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2304)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.