[ G. R. No. 41224. August 16, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41224. August 16, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41224
[ G. R. No. 41224. August 16, 1934 ]
PACIFIC COMMERCIAL COMPANY, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS.MANUEL CONCEPCION AND GERARDO VASQUEZ, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________31st________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Manila_________, dated the _________21st__________ day of __________August_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs in both instance against the defendants and appellants.
It is further ordered that __________the plaintiff-appellee__________ recover from __________the defendants-apppellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. NO. 143380, April 11, 2005
- [ G.R. No. 113150. March 29, 1999 ](365 Phil. 34)
- [ G.R. No. 11813. October 06, 1916 ](G.R. No. 11813)
- [ AM No. MTJ-95-1063. February 09, 1996 ](323 Phil. 438)
- [ G.R. No. 219240. April 04, 2018 ](829 Phil. 306)
- [ G.R. No. 230280. September 16, 2020 ](885 Phil. 318)
- [ G.R. No. L-45271. December 18, 1979 ](183 Phil. 350; 76 OG No. 28, 4854 (July 14, 1980))
- [ G.R. No. 62300. September 25, 1987 ](238 Phil. 277)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.