GLOBAL BUSINESS POWER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES Court of Tax Appeals QUEZON CITY SECOND DIVISION GLOBAL BUSINESS POWER CTA CASE NO. 9973 CORPORATION , Members: Petitioner, CASTANEDA, JR., Chairperson MINDARO-GRULLA, and -versus- BACORRO-VILLENA, JJ . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL Promulgated : p"~� .c::::.. REVENUE, ocr zs2019 t=r Respondent. j7 X------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X RESOLUTION Finding petitioner's "Motion to Withdraw Petition for Refund", filed on September 24 , 2019 to be well-taken , and there being no objection from the respondent, the same is hereby GRANTED. WHEREFORE , CTA Case No. 9973 is hereby deemed WITHDRAWN and considered CLOSED and TERMINATED. SO ORDERED. 9 .c. Cl.r~e4,...9.. . -"�LLENA JUANffO C. CASTANEDk, JR. Associate Justice .... ~N . M~~ .. b~ CIELITO N. MINDARO-GRULLA Associate Justice
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 4335 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 4335)
- NEUFTECH PHILIPPINES INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10442)
- CTA Case No. 3226 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3226)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. ANTONIO VALERIANO M. BERNARDO, (A.V.M. BERNARDO ENGINEERING) (AT-LARGE: Address: No. 604 T. Santiago St., Lingunan, Valenzuela City, Metro Manila)(CTA Case No. O-933)
- PETRON CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9947)
- TRICOR MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Represented by MELANIE R. GERASTA v. CEBU CITY GOVERNMENT and OFFICE OF THE CITY TREASURER, represented by MARE VAE F. REYES, City Treasurer of Cebu City(CTA Case No. AC-299)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. JCLN GLOBAL PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT CORP. (Address: G6 Dakota Residences, Gen. Malvar St., corner Adriatico St., Malate, Manila) JAMES CHRISTOPHER L. NAPOLES (At-Large/Address: D Lafayette Condo Libis, Quezon City) and, JO CHRISTINE L. NAPOLES (At-Large/ Address: No. 635 San Isidro St., Ayala Alabang, Muntinlupa City(CTA Case No. O-1193)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-80 (Resolution on MR)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-80)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.