[ G. R. No. 38018. May 20, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38018. May 20, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38018
[ G. R. No. 38018. May 20, 1934 ]
PEDRO SABADO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. JOAQUIN BELTRAN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________5th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pampanga________, dated the __________23rd__________ day of _________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed in all its parts, with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that ___________appellees__________ recover from __________appellants__________the sum of P__40.00___, as cost.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. Nos. 208733-34. August 19, 2019 ](860 Phil. 13)
- [ A.M. NO. 06-2-43-MTC. March 30, 2006 ](520 Phil. 434)
- [ G.R. Nos. 162144-54. November 21, 2012 ](698 Phil. 471)
- [ G.R. No. 1042. March 09, 1903 ](G.R. No. 1042)
- [ G. R. No. L-4463. March 24, 1953 ]
- [ G.R. No. 113804. January 16, 1998 ](348 Phil. 246)
- G.R. No. 165951, March 30, 2010
- [ G.R. NO. 143527. December 06, 2006 ](539 Phil. 220)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.